The Five Lives assessment demonstrates high usability and reliability among older adults. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 756 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
30,980 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Study objectives To examine the association of sleep complaints reported at baseline (insomnia complaints and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS)) and medication, with cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 4,894 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Although brain neuroinflammation may play an instrumental role in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease, its actual impact on disease progression remains controversial, being reported as either detrimental or protective. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 33 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The efficacy, safety and disease-modification of tramiprosate (homotaurine)were investigated in a recently completed large-scale Phase III clinical study in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD), the Alphase study. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 109 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The BHA-CS was accurate at detecting cognitive impairment and exhibited excellent long-term stability. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 340 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
67/100
Florbetapir F 18 PET can image amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregates in the brains of living subjects. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 51 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Conventional neuropsychological assessments for Alzheimer's disease are burdensome and inaccurate at detecting mild cognitive impairment and predicting Alzheimer's disease risk. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 525 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Digital biomarkers are defined as objective, quantifiable physiological and behavioral data that are collected and measured by means of digital devices. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 568 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Numerous studies have found associations between characteristics of urban environments and risk factors for dementia and cognitive decline, such as physical inactivity and obesity. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,800 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our results suggest that a longitudinal digital biomarker differentiates between controls and patients with MCI in a very cost-effective and noninvasive way and hence may be very useful for identifying patients with very early AD who can benefit from clinical trials and new, disease-modifying therapies. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 20 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cognitive decline is a debilitating manifestation of disease progression in Parkinson's disease. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 3,200 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The impact of Parkinson's disease (PD) dementia is substantial and has major functional and socioeconomic consequences. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 486 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Longitudinal cognitive testing is essential for developing novel preventive interventions for dementia and Alzheimer's disease; however, the few available tools have significant practice effect and depend on an external evaluator. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 50 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
DNS-br total score and majority of the 11 DNS-br neurocognitive subdomain scores were significantly associated with FDG-PET resilience signature, PIB ratio, cerebral gray matter and white matter volume after adjusting for multiple testing. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 283 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The BABRI-BHS is an effective and efficient geriatric health care solution that is suitable for community-based dementia risk screening, providing stepwise cognitive assessments and helping older adults acquire tailored interventions and guidance conveniently. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Participants: 5,593 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The study of cognition in Parkinson's disease (PD) traditionally requires exhaustive recruitment strategies. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 11,813 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We found that momentary quality of life, reliably assessed by tablet, was associated with comprehensive measures of quality of life and depressive symptoms in people with dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 150 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study is based on a population-based cohort of 7,839 subjects over 65 years with 7 years of follow-up. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 7,839 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Prospective cohort study with 5 years of follow-up. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 154 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Lipid-lowering medications (LLMs) and especially statin drugs can delay cognitive decline and dementia onset in individuals with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at baseline. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Difficulties in the performance of everyday activities were found more frequently in non-demented subjects with mild cognitive deficits than in the general population. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 368 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cognivue ® scores ≤ 50 avoid misclassification of impairment, and scores ≥ 75 avoid misclassification of unimpairment. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 92 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Carriers had lower LAS-FNAME performance (P < 0.001) and higher p-tau217 (P < 0.001), NfL (P = 0.013), and GFAP (P < 0.001) levels than non-carriers. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This linguistically optimized Spanish translation of the OSU TBI-ID is recommended for use as a semistructured interview among Spanish-dominant older adults. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 22 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
UK care home residents are often poorly served by existing healthcare arrangements. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 323 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,980 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,980 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.4%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,042 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 967 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events