28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The incidence of CIND is greater than the incidence of dementia, and those with CIND are at high risk of progressing to dementia, making CIND a potentially valuable target for treatments aimed at slowing cognitive decline. 1 key finding →
Participants: 456 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease in which microglia play a significant and active role. 4 key findings →
Participants: 923 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A high intake of saturated fat and cholesterol and a low intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids have been related to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sleep disturbance is common in dementia, although it is unclear whether differences in sleep architecture precede dementia onset. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The American Heart Association developed the ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) index as a simple tool to promote CVH; yet, its association with brain atrophy and dementia remains unexamined. 4 key findings →
Participants: 2,750 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Air pollution may cause inflammatory and oxidative stress damage to the brain, leading to neurodegenerative disease. 4 key findings →
Participants: 680 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We categorized CVH on the basis of the American Heart Association Ideal CVH Index and genetic risk through a genetic risk score (GRS) of common genetic variants and the APOE ε4 genotype in 1,211 Framingham Heart Study (FHS) offspring cohort participants. 4 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Chronic musculoskeletal pain has been linked to dementia; however, chronic pain typically occurs in multiple sites; therefore, this study was to investigate whether greater number of chronic pain sites is associated with a higher risk of dementia and its subtypes. 4 key findings →
Participants: 356,383 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Perivascular spaces (PVS) visible on MRI scans may represent key aspects in the pathophysiology of stroke and dementia, including cerebral small vessel disease and glymphatic dysfunction. 4 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Totally 7499 participants were included in the analysis, representing 40,728,543 community-living older Americans. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 7,499 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among non-Latino Whites, ADI was associated with dementia incidence (most vs. least disadvantaged ADI quintile HR = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-1.15). 4 key findings →
Participants: 18,103 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Addressing modifiable dementia risk factors requires reliable risk assessment methods. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This cohort study compares the risk of incident all-cause dementia among people with hearing loss who use vs do not use hearing aids. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
During follow-up ranging from 1.0 to 22.9 years, 75 patients (29.88%) converted to AD. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 75 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A multivariate analysis was also performed to predict specific risk factors associated with male and female EOAD and LOAD patients. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 6,212 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We found no significant difference in dementia incidence over a 20‐year follow‐up period compared with matched TIA‐free controls. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 297 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 510 memory-clinic subjects(N = 155 cognitive decline), RetiPhenoAge associated with incident cognitive decline (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.64, p = 0.004), and incident dementia (SHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.02-2.01, p = 0.036). 5 key findings →
Participants: 155 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We identified 62 928 patients with OSA and 62 928 in the propensity score-matched comparison cohort (76% male, median age 52 years). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 928 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Each 1-unit increase in cumulative score was associated with a 3%-8% higher dementia hazard across cohorts. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 23,305 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Individuals with both physical frailty and depression had the highest risk of dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 947 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among the 393 497 All of Us participants with linked EHRs, we identified 9444 individuals (2.40%) with glaucoma diagnoses (excluding participants with diagnoses of dementia before glaucoma) and 37 776 matched controls without glaucoma. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 5,756 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We found significant impacts of hypertension, diabetes and their comorbidity on cognitive impairment occurrence. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 40,103 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our analysis identified risk factors that contribute to sex differences in ADEN. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 128,769 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
= 0.991). Optimal sleep modified both cognitive performance and dementia risk in individuals with focal epilepsy compared with stroke patients and healthy controls. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A decreasing linear trend was observed between higher levels of curry consumption and cognitive decline (p = 0.037). 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,920 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
10 of the 3,281 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →