Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 61 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Mary Poppins famously asserted that "a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down," but this bon mot is likely wrong in almost every way.In fact, anecdotal and experimental data suggest health and longevity benefits to nutritional scarcity.The Western diet, with its heavy use of added sugars and high-fructose corn syrup in drinks and snacks, has contributed to the epidemics of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and obesity, with adverse cardiometabolic effects and growing health consequences.1 Stroke remains a significant, growing public health burden in the United States. 2 The combined burden of Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRDs) is primarily driven by cardiometabolic morbidity.3 That spoonful of sugar causes a spike in blood glucose, disrupts homeostasis, and may have adverse consequences for the brain.The observations of Caro et al. 4 in this issue of Neurology ® and data from a host of sources are causing us to rethink how we can leverage glucose modulation for therapeutic benefit.5 Over nearly a century, we have come to understand the role that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and its receptor play in blood glucose regulation, ultimately leading to the development of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), first as treatment for diabetes and then for obesity.6 The first of these was derived from a GLP-1 analog in the venom of Gila monsters.In the 20+ years since their original release, evidence has emerged that these drugs may have cardiometabolic benefits beyond their original intent and independent of weight loss.A meta-analysis of 28 RCTs (74,148 patients) found a 27% reduction in ischemic stroke (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.60-0.89) in treated patients with T2DM.7 The beneficial effects seem strongest for longacting GLP-1RAs, and the effect strengthens with longer periods of exposure.A target trial emulation in a population-based cohort study found that GLP-1RA use in T2DM was associated with a 33% lower risk of ADRDs compared with other glucose-lowering drugs.8 A metaanalysis of RCTs found that GLP-1RAs reduced odds of dementia/cognitive impairment by approximately 45%, a benefit not observed with other classes of drugs.9

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Worrall, B. B., & Ratan, R. R. (2026). What Do Sugar, Gila Monsters, and the Therapeutic Dance Have in Common With GLP-1RA, Stroke, and Dementia? Neurology Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1212/nxg.0000000000200450

Vancouver

Worrall BB, Ratan RR. What Do Sugar, Gila Monsters, and the Therapeutic Dance Have in Common With GLP-1RA, Stroke, and Dementia? Neurology Genetics. 2026. doi:10.1212/nxg.0000000000200450.

BibTeX

@article{worrall2026-1bda82c8,
  author  = {Worrall, Bradford B. and Ratan, Rajiv R.},
  title   = {{What Do Sugar, Gila Monsters, and the Therapeutic Dance Have in Common With GLP-1RA, Stroke, and Dementia?}},
  journal = {Neurology Genetics},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1212/nxg.0000000000200450},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/nxg.0000000000200450}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This editorial discusses how diet, glucose regulation and GLP-1 receptor agonists relate to stroke and dementia risk. It presents commentary rather than new trial results on treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 61/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 57 of the 94 points it could be judged on, which is 61 of 100. Total 61 of 100.57 of the 94 points we could judge = 61 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a meta-analysis pooling many studies. We have no data on impact for its field and year, so that was left out: it earned 57 of the 94 points we could judge it on, which is 61 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neurology Genetics)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Neurology Genetics: journal h-index 53 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 12 / 12 A meta-analysis pooling many studies
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 74,148 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomization is not credited here
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Rajiv R. Ratan: h-index 77 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Weill Cornell Medicine: institution h-index 1,163 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 57 / 94 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 57 of the 94 points we could judge it on is 61 out of 100.
Total 61 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Drug development

Also tagged “tdp-43”

1,150 studies in the library carry the topic tag “tdp-43”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,150 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →