Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 55 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is critical yet challenging, particularly in younger individuals. This study leverages artificial intelligence to analyze digital voice recordings from the Craft Story Recall task within the Longitudinal Early-onset AD Study (LEADS) to (1) detect cognitive impairment and (2) differentiate early-onset AD (EOAD) from early onset non-AD cognitive impairment (EOnonAD). Using speech samples from 120 patients and 68 cognitively unimpaired controls, we employed two classification approaches: feature-engineered machine learning and end-to-end deep learning incorporating a Large Language Model. To detect mild cognitive impairment, the feature-engineered model, using acoustic and linguistic features, achieved an AUC of 0.945 on the holdout test set, while the end-to-end model yielded an AUC of 0.988. For differentiating EOAD from EOnonAD, the feature-engineered model achieved an AUC of 0.804, and the end-to-end model yielded an AUC of 0.904 on the holdout set. Explainability analyses revealed reduced linguistic informativeness as a key AD indicator.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Rezaii, N., Wong, B., Aisen, P., Beckett, L. A., Dage, J. L., Eloyan, A., et al. (2025). Voiceprints of cognitive impairment: analyzing digital voice for early detection of Alzheimer’s and related dementias. npj Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44400-025-00040-0

Vancouver

Rezaii N, Wong B, Aisen P, Beckett LA, Dage JL, Eloyan A, et al. Voiceprints of cognitive impairment: analyzing digital voice for early detection of Alzheimer’s and related dementias. npj Dementia. 2025. doi:10.1038/s44400-025-00040-0. PMID: 41195302.

BibTeX

@article{rezaii2025-41195302,
  author  = {Rezaii, Neguine and Wong, Bonnie and Aisen, Paul and Beckett, Laurel A. and Dage, Jeffrey L. and Eloyan, Ani and Foroud, Tatiana M. and Womack, Kyle B. and others},
  title   = {{Voiceprints of cognitive impairment: analyzing digital voice for early detection of Alzheimer’s and related dementias}},
  journal = {npj Dementia},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1038/s44400-025-00040-0},
  pmid    = {41195302},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s44400-025-00040-0}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Analyzing digital voice recordings, machine learning detected mild cognitive impairment with an AUC up to 0.988 and differentiated early-onset Alzheimer's from other early-onset cognitive impairment with an AUC up to 0.904. This is about early detection, not treating, curing or preventing the disease.

Study details

How this study scored 55/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 55 of 100.55 of 100 points earned45 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (npj Dementia)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Npj Dementia: journal h-index 10 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 120 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 7 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Kathy L. Newell: h-index 37 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 University of Washington: institution h-index 3,540 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 29 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41195302)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 55 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,223 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,223 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →