Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Caregiving

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

People living with dementia and their care partners benefit from services and supports from a wide variety of healthcare and social service professionals. This article provides an overview of the dementia care workforce and highlights gaps and opportunities for data collection and research to advance the workforce and its contributions to high-quality care. The authors provide an analysis of literature, trends, research gaps, and research opportunities, drawing from the literature and their own research. There are notable gaps in our ability to track career pathways, assess the impact of training, identify best practices for recruitment and retention, and understand attributes of the workforce that may affect the quality of both workers' lives and the care they provide to people living with dementia. There are many opportunities for new research to help direct care workers meaningfully contribute to the health and well-being of people living with dementia and their care partners. HIGHLIGHTS: The dementia care workforce works in multiple settings and includes many occupations. There are gaps in knowledge regarding the workforce and its role in high-quality care. Evaluation research is needed to improve direct care worker recruitment, retention, and knowledge. Research on caregiving teams including direct care workers, other workers, and families is needed.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Travers, J. L., Reckrey, J. M., Frogner, B. K., Grabowski, D. C., & Spetz, J. (2025). The dementia care workforce: Essential to care but large research gaps exist. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70269

Vancouver

Travers JL, Reckrey JM, Frogner BK, Grabowski DC, Spetz J. The dementia care workforce: Essential to care but large research gaps exist. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz.70269. PMID: 40371672.

BibTeX

@article{travers2025-40371672,
  author  = {Travers, Jasmine L. and Reckrey, Jennifer M. and Frogner, Bianca K. and Grabowski, David C. and Spetz, Joanne},
  title   = {{The dementia care workforce: Essential to care but large research gaps exist}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.70269},
  pmid    = {40371672},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70269}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This article describes the dementia care workforce and identifies large gaps in tracking career pathways, assessing training impact, and understanding recruitment and retention. It calls for evaluation research but does not test any workforce intervention.

Study details

How this study scored 47/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 47 of 100.47 of 100 points earned53 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 16 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 5.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 19.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 16 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Joanne Spetz: h-index 45 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 University of Washington: institution h-index 3,540 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40371672)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 47 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Caregiving

Also tagged “nursing”

995 studies in the library carry the topic tag “nursing”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 995 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Caregiving

See all studies in Caregiving →