Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Niemann-Pick disease type C and Alzheimer's disease are distinct neurodegenerative disorders that share the presence of neurofibrillary tangle pathology. In this multicentre study, we measured plasma phosphorylated-tau217 in controls ( n = 60), Niemann-Pick disease type C ( n = 71) and Alzheimer's disease ( n = 30 positive for amyloid and negative for tau in CSF [A + T - ] and n = 30 positive for both [A + T + ]). Annual Severity Increment Score and Lysotracker measurements were evaluated in the Niemann-Pick disease type C group to estimate the rate of progression and lysosomal enlargement, respectively. In the cross-sectional analysis, plasma phosphorylated-tau217 was increased in Niemann-Pick disease type C compared with controls (2.52 ± 1.93 versus 1.02 ± 0.34 pg/mL, respectively, P < 0.001) and inversely correlated with age at disease onset ( R = -0.54, P < 0.001). In the longitudinal analysis, plasma phosphorylated-tau217 was associated with disease progression determined by Annual Severity Increment Score ( R = 0.48, P < 0.001) and lysosomal enlargement ( R = 0.26, P = 0.004). We found no differences between A + T - Alzheimer's disease and Niemann-Pick disease type C (2.67 ± 1.18 versus 2.52 ± 1. 93 pg/mL, P = 0.31); however, A + T + Alzheimer's disease had significantly higher levels than Niemann-Pick disease type C (3.26 ± 1.36 versus 2.52 ± 1.93 pg/mL, P = 0.001). Our findings suggest that plasma p-tau217 can increase in brain disorders with isolated tau pathology. Plasma p-tau217 associations with disease progression and severity make it a potential marker in Niemann-Pick disease type C.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Gonzalez-Ortiz, F., Karikari, T. K., Taylor-Te Vruchte, D., Shepherd, D., Kirsebom, B. E., Fladby, T., et al. (2024). Plasma phosphorylated-tau217 is increased in Niemann-Pick disease type C. Brain communications. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae375

Vancouver

Gonzalez-Ortiz F, Karikari TK, Taylor-Te Vruchte D, Shepherd D, Kirsebom BE, Fladby T, et al. Plasma phosphorylated-tau217 is increased in Niemann-Pick disease type C. Brain communications. 2024. doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcae375. PMID: 39502943.

BibTeX

@article{gonzalezortiz2024-39502943,
  author  = {Gonzalez-Ortiz, F. and Karikari, T. K. and Taylor-Te Vruchte, D. and Shepherd, D. and Kirsebom, B. E. and Fladby, T. and Platt, F. and Blennow, K.},
  title   = {{Plasma phosphorylated-tau217 is increased in Niemann-Pick disease type C}},
  journal = {Brain communications},
  year    = {2024},
  doi     = {10.1093/braincomms/fcae375},
  pmid    = {39502943},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae375}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 66/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 38 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 66 of 100. Total 66 of 100.38 of the 58 points we could judge = 66 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 38 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 66 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Brain communications)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 60 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39502943)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 38 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 38 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 66 out of 100.
Total 66 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “increased”

5 studies in the library carry the topic tag “increased”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 5 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →