Home › Research › Biomarkers
Plasma neurofilament light chain in memory clinic practice: Evidence from a real-life study
Karl Götze, Agathe Vrillon, Elodie Bouaziz-Amar, François Mouton-Liger, Jacques Hugon, Matthieu Martinet, Julien Dumurgier, Emmanuel Cognat et al.. Neurobiology of disease, 2022-12-01
Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers
Participants (N = 558, mean age = 69.2 ± 8.8, 56.5% women) were diagnosed with AD (n = 274, considering dementia and MCI stages), frontotemporal dementia (FTD, n = 55), Lewy body disease (LBD, n = 40, considering MCI and dementia stages), other neurodegenerative diseases, n = 57 (e.g Supranuclear Palsy, Corticobasal syndrome), non-neurodegenerative cognitive impairment (NND, n = 79, e.g. vascular lesions, epilepsy or psychiatric disorders) or subjective cognitive impairment (SCI, n = 53). Mean plasma NfL (log, pg/mL) levels were higher in neurodegenerative than non-neurodegenerative disorders (1.35 ± 0.2 vs 1.16 ± 0.23, p < 0.001), higher in all diagnostic groups than in SCI (1.06 ± 0.23) p < 0.001), and associated with the stage of cognitive impairment (p < 0.001). The addition of plasma NfL to a clinical model (age, MMSE and APOE ε4 carriership) marginally improved the discrimination of degenerative from non-degenerative disorders in ROC analysis (AUC clinical model: 0.81, 95% CI = [0.77;0.85] AUC clinical model + plasma NfL: AUC = 0.83 95% CI = [0.78;0.87], delta Akaike information criterion = -11.7). Plasma NfL could help discrimination between degenerative and non-degenerative cognitive disorders, albeit not better than comprehensive clinical evaluation.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Götze, K., Vrillon, A., Bouaziz-Amar, E., Mouton-Liger, F., Hugon, J., Martinet, M., et al. (2023). Plasma neurofilament light chain in memory clinic practice: Evidence from a real-life study. Neurobiology of disease. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105937
Vancouver
Götze K, Vrillon A, Bouaziz-Amar E, Mouton-Liger F, Hugon J, Martinet M, et al. Plasma neurofilament light chain in memory clinic practice: Evidence from a real-life study. Neurobiology of disease. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105937. PMID: 36462720.
BibTeX
@article{gotze2023-36462720,
author = {Götze, Karl and Vrillon, Agathe and Bouaziz-Amar, Elodie and Mouton-Liger, François and Hugon, Jacques and Martinet, Matthieu and Dumurgier, Julien and Cognat, Emmanuel and others},
title = {{Plasma neurofilament light chain in memory clinic practice: Evidence from a real-life study}},
journal = {Neurobiology of disease},
year = {2023},
doi = {10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105937},
pmid = {36462720},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105937}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Participants (N = 558, mean age = 69.2 ± 8.8, 56.5% women) were diagnosed with AD (n = 274, considering dementia and MCI stages), frontotemporal dementia (FTD, n = 55), Lewy body disease (LBD, n = 40, considering MCI and dementia stages), other neurodegenerative diseases, n = 57 (e.g Supranuclear Palsy, Corticobasal syndrome), non-neurodegenerative cognitive impairment (NND, n = 79, e.g. vascular lesions, epilepsy or psychiatric disorders) or subjective cognitive impairment (SCI, n = 53).
- Mean plasma NfL (log, pg/mL) levels were higher in neurodegenerative than non-neurodegenerative disorders (1.35 ± 0.2 vs 1.16 ± 0.23, p < 0.001), higher in all diagnostic groups than in SCI (1.06 ± 0.23) p < 0.001), and associated with the stage of cognitive impairment (p < 0.001).
- The addition of plasma NfL to a clinical model (age, MMSE and APOE ε4 carriership) marginally improved the discrimination of degenerative from non-degenerative disorders in ROC analysis (AUC clinical model: 0.81, 95% CI = [0.77;0.85] AUC clinical model + plasma NfL: AUC = 0.83 95% CI = [0.78;0.87], delta Akaike information criterion = -11.7).
- Plasma NfL could help discrimination between degenerative and non-degenerative cognitive disorders, albeit not better than comprehensive clinical evaluation.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Study designcross-sectional
- Participants558
- Effect size56.5%; AUC = 0.83
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 66/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 37 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 66 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neurobiology of disease) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 4 / 12 | A snapshot of people at one point in time |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 558 participants |
| Effect reported | 3 / 3 | Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 36462720) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 37 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 37 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 66 out of 100. |
| Total | 66 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Biomarkers
Also tagged “neurofilament”
697 studies in the library carry the topic tag “neurofilament”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 697 tagged studies.