Home › Research › Biomarkers
Plasma neurofilament light chain as prognostic marker of cognitive decline in neurodegenerative diseases, a clinical setting study
Karl Götze, Agathe Vrillon, Julien Dumurgier, Sandrine Indart, Marta Sanchez-Ortiz, Hela Slimi, Agathe Raynaud-Simon, Emmanuel Cognat et al.. Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2024-10-19
Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment
In 320 patients, baseline plasma NfL levels were negatively associated with global cognition (β=-1.28 (-1.81 ; -0.75) P < 0.001), memory (β=-1.48 (-2.38 ; -0.59), P = 0.001), language (β=-1.72(-2.49 ; -0.95) P < 0.001), praxis (β=-2.02 (-2.91 ; -1.13) P < 0.001) and executive functions (β=-0.81, P < 0.001). Across diagnosis, plasma NfL levels were negatively associated with cross-sectional global cognition in all but the SCD subgroup, specifically with executive functions and memory in AD (respectively β=-0.71(-1.21 ; -0.211), P = 0.005 and β=-1.29 (-2.17 ; -0.42), P = 0.004), and with attention in LBD (β=-0.81(-1.16 ; -0.002), P = 0.03). Linear mixed-effects models showed that plasma NfL predicted MMSE decline in the global population (βPlasmaNfLxTime=-0.15 (-0.26 ; -0.04), P = 0.006), as in the neurodegenerative condition subgroup (βPlasmaNfLxTime=-0.21 (-0.37 ; - 0.06), P = 0.007), but not in non-neurodegenerative condition subgroup. In our clinical cohort, plasma NfL was associated with faster cognitive decline in neurodegenerative dementia, which corroborates data obtained in research cohorts. Yet, plasma NfL was not predictive of accelerated cognitive decline in individuals without neurodegeneration, suggesting its use as a neurodegeneration-specific predictive biomarker.
Key findings
- In 320 patients, baseline plasma NfL levels were negatively associated with global cognition (β=-1.28 (-1.81 ; -0.75) P < 0.001), memory (β=-1.48 (-2.38 ; -0.59), P = 0.001), language (β=-1.72(-2.49 ; -0.95) P < 0.001), praxis (β=-2.02 (-2.91 ; -1.13) P < 0.001) and executive functions (β=-0.81, P < 0.001).
- Across diagnosis, plasma NfL levels were negatively associated with cross-sectional global cognition in all but the SCD subgroup, specifically with executive functions and memory in AD (respectively β=-0.71(-1.21 ; -0.211), P = 0.005 and β=-1.29 (-2.17 ; -0.42), P = 0.004), and with attention in LBD (β=-0.81(-1.16 ; -0.002), P = 0.03).
- Linear mixed-effects models showed that plasma NfL predicted MMSE decline in the global population (βPlasmaNfLxTime=-0.15 (-0.26 ; -0.04), P = 0.006), as in the neurodegenerative condition subgroup (βPlasmaNfLxTime=-0.21 (-0.37 ; - 0.06), P = 0.007), but not in non-neurodegenerative condition subgroup.
- In our clinical cohort, plasma NfL was associated with faster cognitive decline in neurodegenerative dementia, which corroborates data obtained in research cohorts.
- Yet, plasma NfL was not predictive of accelerated cognitive decline in individuals without neurodegeneration, suggesting its use as a neurodegeneration-specific predictive biomarker.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Study designcross-sectional
- Participants158
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 63/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 35 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 63 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer's research & therapy) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 4 / 12 | A snapshot of people at one point in time |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 158 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39427171) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 35 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 35 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 63 out of 100. |
| Total | 63 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Götze, K., Vrillon, A., Dumurgier, J., Indart, S., Sanchez-Ortiz, M., Slimi, H., et al. (2024). Plasma neurofilament light chain as prognostic marker of cognitive decline in neurodegenerative diseases, a clinical setting study. Alzheimer's research & therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01593-7
Vancouver
Götze K, Vrillon A, Dumurgier J, Indart S, Sanchez-Ortiz M, Slimi H, et al. Plasma neurofilament light chain as prognostic marker of cognitive decline in neurodegenerative diseases, a clinical setting study. Alzheimer's research & therapy. 2024. doi:10.1186/s13195-024-01593-7. PMID: 39427171.
BibTeX
@article{gotze2024-39427171,
author = {Götze, Karl and Vrillon, Agathe and Dumurgier, Julien and Indart, Sandrine and Sanchez-Ortiz, Marta and Slimi, Hela and Raynaud-Simon, Agathe and Cognat, Emmanuel and others},
title = {{Plasma neurofilament light chain as prognostic marker of cognitive decline in neurodegenerative diseases, a clinical setting study}},
journal = {Alzheimer's research \& therapy},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1186/s13195-024-01593-7},
pmid = {39427171},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01593-7}
}