Home › Research › Biomarkers
Plasma MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio serves as a novel potential biomarker in Alzheimer's disease
Liu J, Li X, Qu J.. Neuroreport, 2023-08-29
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
Plain-language summary
This study aimed to explore the diagnostic potential of plasma MMP-9, TIMP-1 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio for Alzheimer's disease (AD). This retrospective study was performed in a cohort consisting of patients with AD (AD group) and cognitive normal subjects (HC group). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) classic biomarkers including Aβ42, Aβ40, total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) levels, and plasma MMP-9 and TIMP-1 levels were measured by commercially available ELISA kits, respectively. The differential diagnostic potential of plasma MMP-9, TIMP-1 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. It was observed that significantly elevated levels of plasma MMP-9 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio in patients with AD than HC. Both MMP-9 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratios were negatively correlated with CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio and positively correlated with CSF p-tau in AD group. ROC curve analysis showed better diagnostic accuracy of MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio than MMP-9 for AD at a cutoff value of 1.35 with an area under the curve of 0.906 and sensitivity and specificity of 95.8% and 75%, respectively. Our findings encourage the use of plasma MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio as a biomarker in the diagnosis of AD.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Liu, J., Li, X., & Qu, J. (2023). Plasma MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio serves as a novel potential biomarker in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroreport. https://doi.org/10.1097/wnr.0000000000001952
Vancouver
Liu J, Li X, Qu J. Plasma MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio serves as a novel potential biomarker in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroreport. 2023. doi:10.1097/wnr.0000000000001952. PMID: 37695608.
BibTeX
@article{liu2023-37695608,
author = {Liu, J. and Li, X. and Qu, J.},
title = {{Plasma MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio serves as a novel potential biomarker in Alzheimer's disease}},
journal = {Neuroreport},
year = {2023},
doi = {10.1097/wnr.0000000000001952},
pmid = {37695608},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/wnr.0000000000001952}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- It was observed that significantly elevated levels of plasma MMP-9 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio in patients with AD than HC.
- Our findings encourage the use of plasma MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio as a biomarker in the diagnosis of AD.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Effect size95.8%
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 47/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 27 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 47 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neuroreport) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 37695608) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 27 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 27 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 47 out of 100. |
| Total | 47 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Biomarkers from nearby years
Also tagged “ratio”
5 studies in the library carry the topic tag “ratio”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 5 tagged studies.