Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 58 out of 100. Inflammation and the immune system

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Background Soluble amyloid β 1-42 (Aβ 42 ) signals via the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor to hyperphosphorylate tau in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Simufilam disrupts this pathogenic signaling by binding filamin A and disrupts its linkages with inflammatory receptors to reduce neuroinflammation. We assessed simufilam in two Phase 3 clinical trials in mild-to-moderate AD. Methods Participants were age 50-87 with Stage 4 or 5 CE, a mini-mental state exam (MMSE) ≥16 and ≤27 and a Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score (CDR-GS) of 0.5, 1 or 2. The criterion supporting AD pathology was plasma phosphorylated (p)-tau181 or prior amyloid PET. RETHINK randomized participants to simufilam 100 mg or placebo for 52 weeks. REFOCUS evaluated simufilam 50 and 100 mg versus placebo for 76 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were change from baseline on ADAS-Cog12 and ADCS-ADL. Sub-studies assessed exploratory plasma biomarkers and, in REFOCUS only, CSF and imaging biomarkers. Results Both trials failed to meet co-primary, secondary or exploratory biomarker endpoints. REFOCUS was terminated early, with 22% of participants still active in the trial. In the predefined mild subgroup in REFOCUS, simufilam was associated with slower cognitive decline than placebo through Week 64 (p = 0.019). This finding disappeared at Week 76 with 45% missing data and did not replicate in RETHINK. Favorable nominal exploratory post-hoc findings amongst participants with the highest half of screening plasma p-tau181 levels occurred in RETHINK but not REFOCUS. The plasma p-tau181 entry criterion did not reliably exclude amyloid PET negativity in the sub-study. Conclusions Simufilam did not meet co-primary or secondary endpoints in these Phase 3 trials. Simufilam was safe and well tolerated. Trials registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04994483 and NCT05026177.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Kupiec, J. W., Porsteinsson, A. P., Turner, R. S., Hendrix, S., Mallinckrodt, C., Khan, A., et al. (2026). Phase 3 randomized clinical trials of simufilam in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100469

Vancouver

Kupiec JW, Porsteinsson AP, Turner RS, Hendrix S, Mallinckrodt C, Khan A, et al. Phase 3 randomized clinical trials of simufilam in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100469. PMID: 41500915.

BibTeX

@article{kupiec2026-41500915,
  author  = {Kupiec, J. W. and Porsteinsson, A. P. and Turner, R. S. and Hendrix, S. and Mallinckrodt, C. and Khan, A. and Cohen, I. and Liss, J. and others},
  title   = {{Phase 3 randomized clinical trials of simufilam in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100469},
  pmid    = {41500915},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100469}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In two Phase 3 trials, RETHINK and REFOCUS, simufilam failed to meet its main or secondary goals for slowing decline in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's. An early hint of benefit in a mild subgroup disappeared later and did not repeat in the other trial, though the drug was safe and well tolerated. These results do not support simufilam as an Alzheimer's treatment.

Study details

How this study scored 58/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 58 of 100.58 of 100 points earned42 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a large phase 3 trial. Scored zero for sample size and effect reported because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease: journal h-index 63 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A large phase 3 trial (from PubMed type “Clinical Trial, Phase III”)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomized / blinded 1 / 2 Randomized (as stated in the record)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 4 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 16.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 4 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Lindsay H. Burns: h-index 30 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Rochester: institution h-index 1,195 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41500915)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 58 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 13.

Related studies in Inflammation and the immune system

Also tagged “placebo-controlled”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “placebo-controlled”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Inflammation and the immune system

See all studies in Inflammation and the immune system →