Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100. End-of-life care

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract Background Palliative care is underutilized by patients with neurological conditions, especially persons living with dementia (PLWD) residing in community settings in the U.S. Palliative care has not been defined for community-dwelling PLWD, and misconceptions that palliative care is only applicable when the patient is dying may have led to underutilization in this population. Aim To clarify and provide a refined definition of the concept of palliative care for community-dwelling PLWD. Method A concept analysis using Rodger’s method was completed. Three databases were searched for literature that described the antecedents, defining attributes, and consequences of palliative care in the context of community-dwelling PLWD. A model case of the concept was identified from the literature. Results A total of 16 studies were included. Palliative care differs from hospice and does not require PLWD to be near end of life. Antecedents included acute care use, poor prognosis, and primary care provider referral. Defining attributes encompassed comprehensive care, care coordination, and serious illness communication. Consequences included more home death, less hospitalization and other burdensome acute care use, and patients and caregivers electing less aggressive care option. Discussion Antecedents of acute care use and poor prognosis may suggest late utilization of palliative care among PLWD and lack of palliative care needs screening. Defining attribute of care coordination suggest primary care providers (PCPs) play a crucial role in coordinating palliative care for PLWD. Future study should investigate the concept of palliative care needs in PLWD and effectiveness of primary care based palliative care models for PLWD

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Ji, X. (2025). Palliative Care for Community-Dwelling Persons Living With Dementia: A Concept Analysis. Innovation in Aging. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1698

Vancouver

Ji X. Palliative Care for Community-Dwelling Persons Living With Dementia: A Concept Analysis. Innovation in Aging. 2025. doi:10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1698.

BibTeX

@article{ji2025-1c40afc9,
  author  = {Ji, Xuefan},
  title   = {{Palliative Care for Community-Dwelling Persons Living With Dementia: A Concept Analysis}},
  journal = {Innovation in Aging},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1698},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1698}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This concept analysis of 16 studies clarifies that palliative care for community-dwelling persons with dementia differs from hospice and does not require being near end of life, and that its consequences include more home deaths and less burdensome acute care use. It addresses care delivery and quality of life, not treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 32/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 31 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 32 of 100. Total 32 of 100.31 of the 96 points we could judge = 32 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 31 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 32 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Innovation in Aging)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Innovation in Aging: journal h-index 48 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 16 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Xuefan Ji holds only 3 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Columbia University: institution h-index 1,824 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 31 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 31 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 32 out of 100.
Total 32 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in End-of-life care

Also tagged “nursing”

995 studies in the library carry the topic tag “nursing”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 995 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on End-of-life care

See all studies in End-of-life care →