Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Exposure to high neighborhood‐level socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with negative health outcomes. Recent cross‐sectional studies demonstrated that living in the most highly disadvantaged areas was associated with lower hippocampal volume, total brain volume1 and cognitive performance2 in an unimpaired older cohort. Result Living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods (top 20% ADI vs all others) was associated with decreasing cortical thickness over time within AD‐signature region (b[95%CI]=‐0.02mm/year[‐0.03,‐0.005], p=0.01) and sub‐regions (Fig.1). Conclusion In cognitively unimpaired adults, exposure to the highest relative levels of neighborhood‐level disadvantage was associated with increased rates of cortical thinning and declining cognitive test performance, particularly in the executive function domain. Using longitudinal data, this work extends previous cross‐sectional studies, providing additional evidence that living in highly disadvantaged neighborhoods may be associated with accelerated neurodegeneration and cognitive decline with implications for AD and related dementia risk assessment.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Hunt, J. F., Vogt, N. M., Jonaitis, E. M., Buckingham, W. R., Koscik, R. L., Zuelsdorff, M. L., et al. (2020). Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with accelerated cortical thinning and cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired adults. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.043170

Vancouver

Hunt JF, Vogt NM, Jonaitis EM, Buckingham WR, Koscik RL, Zuelsdorff ML, et al. Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with accelerated cortical thinning and cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired adults. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2020. doi:10.1002/alz.043170.

BibTeX

@article{hunt2020-813cddb5,
  author  = {Hunt, Jack F.V. and Vogt, Nicholas M and Jonaitis, Erin McMullen and Buckingham, William R. and Koscik, Rebecca L. and Zuelsdorff, Megan L. and Okonkwo, Ozioma C. and Clark, Lindsay R. and others},
  title   = {{Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with accelerated cortical thinning and cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired adults}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
  year    = {2020},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.043170},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.043170}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In cognitively unimpaired adults, living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods was linked to faster thinning of the cortex over time and declining cognitive test performance, especially in executive function. This is longitudinal evidence of an association, not proof that neighborhood disadvantage causes the changes.

Study details

How this study scored 50/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 50 of 100.50 of 100 points earned50 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 645 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 4 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 8 year(s) since 2020
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Amy Kind: h-index 47 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Wisconsin–Madison: institution h-index 1,518 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 50 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “cognitive-function”

1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitive-function”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →