Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 60 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Circulating metabolites can identify biochemical risk factors related to Alzheimer's disease (AD). We measured plasma metabolites in 1,068 participants of Caribbean Hispanic ancestry (250 patients with AD and 818 healthy controls) across 2 cohorts and analyzed their relationship with clinical AD, biomarker-supported AD and plasma biomarkers (P-tau181, P-tau217, P-tau231 and Aβ42:Aβ40). Amino acid metabolism pathways were enriched among metabolites associated with P-tau biomarkers, whereas sialic acid and N-glycan pathways were associated with Aβ42:Aβ40. Through several dimensionality reduction approaches, we identified an APOE-ε4 dependent relationship between lysophosphatidylcholines (lysoPCs) carrying polyunsaturated fatty acids and biomarker-supported AD and P-tau biomarkers. In an independent dataset of 110 postmortem brain tissues from non-Hispanic white participants, lysoPCs in the brain were also associated with AD neuropathological features. Our results show that biomarker-based diagnostic criteria identified an APOE-ε4 dependent association with lysoPCs, which play a critical role in the transport of neuroprotective polyunsaturated fatty acids into the brain, and AD.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Kalia, V., Reyes-Dumeyer, D., Dubey, S., Udhani, H., Nandakumar, R., Lee, A. J., et al. (2026). Lysophosphatidylcholines are associated with amyloidosis in early stages of Alzheimer's disease. Nature aging. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-025-01025-7

Vancouver

Kalia V, Reyes-Dumeyer D, Dubey S, Udhani H, Nandakumar R, Lee AJ, et al. Lysophosphatidylcholines are associated with amyloidosis in early stages of Alzheimer's disease. Nature aging. 2026. doi:10.1038/s43587-025-01025-7. PMID: 41407938.

BibTeX

@article{kalia2026-41407938,
  author  = {Kalia, V. and Reyes-Dumeyer, D. and Dubey, S. and Udhani, H. and Nandakumar, R. and Lee, A. J. and Lantigua, R. and Medrano, M. and others},
  title   = {{Lysophosphatidylcholines are associated with amyloidosis in early stages of Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Nature aging},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1038/s43587-025-01025-7},
  pmid    = {41407938},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-025-01025-7}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 60/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 35 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 60 of 100. Total 60 of 100.35 of the 58 points we could judge = 60 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 35 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 60 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Nature aging)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,068 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41407938)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 35 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 35 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 60 out of 100.
Total 60 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “amyloidosis”

4 studies in the library carry the topic tag “amyloidosis”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 4 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →