Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100. Long-term cohort studies

Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment

Layer II of the entorhinal cortex contains the cells of origin for the perforant path, plays a critical role in memory processing, and consistently degenerates in end-stage Alzheimer's disease. The extent to which neuron loss in layer II of entorhinal cortex is related to mild cognitive impairment without dementia has not been extensively investigated. We analyzed 29 participants who came to autopsy from our ongoing longitudinal study of aging and dementia composed of religious clergy (Religious Orders Study). All individuals underwent detailed clinical evaluation within 12 months of death and were categorized as having no cognitive impairment (n = 8), mild cognitive impairment (n = 10), or mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease (n = 11). Sections through the entorhinal cortex were immunoreacted with an antibody directed against a neuron-specific nuclear protein (NeuN). Stereological counts of NeuN-immunoreactive stellate cells, their volume, and the volume of layer II entorhinal cortex were estimated. Cases exhibiting no cognitive impairment averaged 639,625 +/- 184,600 layer II stellate neurons in the right entorhinal cortex. Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (63.5%; p < 0.0003) and mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease (46.06%; p < 0.0017) displayed significant losses of layer II entorhinal cortex neurons relative to those with no cognitive impairment but not relative to each other (p > 0.33). There was also significant atrophy of layer II entorhinal cortex neurons in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (24.1%) and Alzheimer's disease (25.1%). The volume of layer II was also reduced in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (26.5%), with a further reduction in those with Alzheimer's disease (46.4%). The loss and atrophy of layer II entorhinal cortex neurons significantly correlated with performance on clinical tests of declarative memory. Atrophy of layer II entorhinal cortex and the neurons within this layer significantly correlated with performance on the Mini Mental Status Examination. These data indicate that atrophy and loss of layer II entorhinal cortex neurons occur in elderly subjects with mild cognitive impairment prior to the onset of dementia and suggests that these changes are not exacerbated in early Alzheimer's disease.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Kordower, J. H., Chu, Y., Stebbins, G. T., DeKosky, S. T., Cochran, E. J., Bennett, D., et al. (2001). Loss and atrophy of layer II entorhinal cortex neurons in elderly people with mild cognitive impairment. Annals of neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/1531-8249(20010201)49:2<202::aid-ana40>3.0.co;2-3

Vancouver

Kordower JH, Chu Y, Stebbins GT, DeKosky ST, Cochran EJ, Bennett D, et al. Loss and atrophy of layer II entorhinal cortex neurons in elderly people with mild cognitive impairment. Annals of neurology. 2001. doi:10.1002/1531-8249(20010201)49:2<202::aid-ana40>3.0.co;2-3. PMID: 11220740.

BibTeX

@article{kordower2001-11220740,
  author  = {Kordower, J. H. and Chu, Y. and Stebbins, G. T. and DeKosky, S. T. and Cochran, E. J. and Bennett, D. and Mufson, E. J.},
  title   = {{Loss and atrophy of layer II entorhinal cortex neurons in elderly people with mild cognitive impairment}},
  journal = {Annals of neurology},
  year    = {2001},
  doi     = {10.1002/1531-8249(20010201)49:2<202::aid-ana40>3.0.co;2-3},
  pmid    = {11220740},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/1531-8249(20010201)49:2<202::aid-ana40>3.0.co;2-3}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 66/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 38 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 66 of 100. Total 66 of 100.38 of the 58 points we could judge = 66 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 38 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 66 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Annals of neurology)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2001 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 1 / 4 29 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 11220740)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 38 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 38 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 66 out of 100.
Total 66 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Long-term cohort studies

Also in Long-term cohort studies

54 studies in the library are filed under Long-term cohort studies with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Long-term cohort studies hub.

Similar studies

More on Long-term cohort studies

See all studies in Long-term cohort studies →