Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

In this exploratory sequential mixed-methods study, interviews with 125 adults aged 55-92 (mean age 71) living in the Minneapolis (Minnesota) metropolitan area suggested that eateries, including coffee shops and fast-food restaurants, represent popular neighborhood destinations for older adults and sources of wellbeing. Thematic analysis of how older adults perceived and utilized local eateries included sites of familiarity and comfort; physical and economic accessibility; sociability with friends, family, staff, and customers; and entertainment (e.g., destinations for outings and walks, free newspapers to read). To test the hypothesis that these sites, and the benefits they confer, are associated with cognitive welfare, we analyzed data from urban and suburban community-dwelling participants in the Reasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, a national racially diverse sample of older Americans followed since 2003 (n = 16,404, average age at assessment 72 years). Results from multilevel linear regression models of these data demonstrated a positive association between kernel density of local eateries and cognitive functioning, which corroborated qualitative findings. Taken together, these results complicate our understanding of casual eatery settings as possible sites of wellbeing through social interaction and leisure activities. Results prompt further research investigating whether and how retail food environments can serve as community spaces for older adults that may help buffer against cognitive decline.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Jessica, F., Michael, E., Sandra, T., Iris, G.-L., Dominique, S., Suzanne, J., et al. (2020). Fast-food for thought: Retail food environments as resources for cognitive health and wellbeing among aging Americans? Health & place. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102379

Vancouver

Jessica F, Michael E, Sandra T, Iris G.-L, Dominique S, Suzanne J, et al. Fast-food for thought: Retail food environments as resources for cognitive health and wellbeing among aging Americans? Health & place. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102379. PMID: 32838895.

BibTeX

@article{jessica2020-32838895,
  author  = {Jessica, Finlay and Michael, Esposito and Sandra, Tang and Iris, Gomez-Lopez and Dominique, Sylvers and Suzanne, Judd and Philippa, Clarke},
  title   = {{Fast-food for thought: Retail food environments as resources for cognitive health and wellbeing among aging Americans?}},
  journal = {Health \& place},
  year    = {2020},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102379},
  pmid    = {32838895},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102379}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that older adults often visit local eateries for social contact and wellbeing, and that more eateries in a neighborhood was linked to better cognitive functioning. It is an exploratory study and does not show that eateries cause better cognition or prevent dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 47/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 47 of 100.47 of 100 points earned53 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Health & place)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Health & Place: journal h-index 177 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 16,404 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 52 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-17)
Citations per year 2 / 5 6.5 citations a year over 8 year(s) since 2020
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 30 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Philippa J Clarke: h-index 49 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Michigan: institution h-index 2,222 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 32838895)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 47 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 14.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “controlled”

1,116 studies in the library carry the topic tag “controlled”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,116 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →