Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 42 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract INTRODUCTION Inequities associated with socioeconomic status (SES) manifest across dementia outcomes; however, research investigating service use across SES in people with dementia is scarce. METHODS We conducted a repeated yearly cohort study of community‐dwelling people in Quebec with incident dementia (2000–2017), using health administrative data held at the Quebec National Institute of Public Health (INSPQ). We described 23 indicators of health service use and mortality across levels of material deprivation, derived from a validated ecological index based on the average income, employment, and education of residential neighborhoods. RESULTS Age‐standardized rates of 15/23 indicators differed across SES. Among 193,834 older people newly diagnosed with dementia, those from most deprived areas had more hospitalizations, emergency department visits, potentially inappropriate medication prescriptions, and higher 1‐year mortality, though they had higher care continuity. Conversely, rates were comparable across groups for the prescription of dementia‐specific medications and primary care visits. DISCUSSION Stark differences across SES in service use by people with dementia may indicate different health needs and/or allude to pervasive health inequities. These results can inform policies to address the needs of people with lower SES, to offer equitable, appropriate, and needs‐based care to all people living with dementia.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Godard‐Sebillotte, C., Arsenault‐Lapierre, G., Sourial, N., Navani, S., Quesnel‐Vallée, A., Rochette, L., et al. (2025). Examining equity in service use across socioeconomic status in people with dementia. Alzheimer s & Dementia Behavior & Socioeconomics of Aging. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsa3.70006

Vancouver

Godard‐Sebillotte C, Arsenault‐Lapierre G, Sourial N, Navani S, Quesnel‐Vallée A, Rochette L, et al. Examining equity in service use across socioeconomic status in people with dementia. Alzheimer s & Dementia Behavior & Socioeconomics of Aging. 2025. doi:10.1002/bsa3.70006.

BibTeX

@article{godardsebillotte2025-5fe5230e,
  author  = {Godard‐Sebillotte, Claire and Arsenault‐Lapierre, Geneviève and Sourial, Nadia and Navani, Sanjna and Quesnel‐Vallée, Amélie and Rochette, Louis and Massamba, Victoria Kubuta and Vedel, Isabelle},
  title   = {{Examining equity in service use across socioeconomic status in people with dementia}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia Behavior \& Socioeconomics of Aging},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/bsa3.70006},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/bsa3.70006}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Among 193,834 older people newly diagnosed with dementia in Quebec, rates of 15 of 23 health service use indicators differed by socioeconomic status, with those from the most deprived areas having more hospitalizations, emergency visits, and higher 1-year mortality. The study is about service use and inequities, not about treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 42/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 42 of 100.42 of 100 points earned58 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia Behavior & Socioeconomics of Aging)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia Behavior & Socioeconomics of Aging: journal h-index 4 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Isabelle Vedel: h-index 39 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 McGill University: institution h-index 1,373 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 42 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,223 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,223 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →