Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100. Prevention trials

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Participants numbered 3334 and had a median age of 62 years. Most (72.5%) identified as female; 44.5% had a university education, and 49.1% had a family history of dementia. Most participants (79.5%) agreed that you can reduce your chances of developing dementia. The most recognised mitigation strategies included increased physical activity, social activity and cognitive stimulation, with one-quarter of participants unsure about the management of cholesterol and adoption of a Mediterranean diet. Scores for general dementia risk knowledge and recognition of modifiable risk reduction were midrange and moderately correlated with each other. Correct appraisal of common misconceptions; for example, that aluminium exposure is a risk factor, was poor; only 5.0% of participants scored a midrange score (6/12) or higher, and only 0.2% of participants correctly identified all misconception items. The study highlights the additional insights offered by simultaneously assessing multiple components of dementia risk literacy. Participants in the study demonstrated some knowledge of dementia risk and risk factor mitigation strategies, but had a poor appraisal of common misconceptions. Such insights can inform risk reduction messaging and enable more effective public health campaigns for future risk mitigation.

Key findings

Why it matters

This survey of 3334 older Australians found midrange knowledge about dementia risk and poor recognition of common misconceptions. It does not test any treatment or prevention method, but suggests messaging could be improved.

Study details

How this study scored 43/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 43 of 100.43 of 100 points earned57 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Public Health Research & Practice)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Public Health Research & Practice: journal h-index 39 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Kathleen Doherty: h-index 25 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 University of Tasmania: institution h-index 564 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41134115)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 43 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Eccleston, C. E. A., Kitsos, A., Vickers, J. C., & Doherty, K. (2025). Dementia risk literacy in older Australians: beyond knowledge. Public Health Research & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1071/pu24108

Vancouver

Eccleston CEA, Kitsos A, Vickers JC, Doherty K. Dementia risk literacy in older Australians: beyond knowledge. Public Health Research & Practice. 2025. doi:10.1071/pu24108. PMID: 41134115.

BibTeX

@article{eccleston2025-41134115,
  author  = {Eccleston, Claire E. A. and Kitsos, Alex and Vickers, James Clement and Doherty, Kathleen},
  title   = {{Dementia risk literacy in older Australians: beyond knowledge}},
  journal = {Public Health Research \& Practice},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1071/pu24108},
  pmid    = {41134115},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1071/pu24108}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Prevention trials

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention trials

See all studies in Prevention trials →