Home › Research › Digital health tools
Enhancing Dementia Risk Prediction with Heart Rate and Machine Learning in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)
Shakiru A. Alaka, SoFong Cam Ngan, Rebecca E. K. MacPherson, William Pickett, Christopher Chen, Newman Sze. Alzheimer s & Dementia, 2025-12-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Among the 18,013 participants with complete data for analysis, 516 (2.86%) exhibited cognitive impairment. Incorporating RHR into the CAIDE model led to a significant improvement in predictive accuracy. Random forest models with RHR achieved an AUC of 0.67 and an MCC of 0.32 in training data, compared to 0.65 and 0.29 in the test data. Similarly, support vector machines demonstrated a 2-3% increase in both AUC and MCC with the inclusion of RHR. The addition of resting heart rate significantly improves the predictive accuracy of the CAIDE model, particularly when using machine learning methods. This highlights the potential of this approach to enhance traditional risk models, enabling more precise dementia risk assessments, closer monitoring, and the implementation of preventive strategies.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Alaka, S. A., Ngan, S. C., MacPherson, R. E. K., Pickett, W., Chen, C., & Sze, N. (2025). Enhancing Dementia Risk Prediction with Heart Rate and Machine Learning in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70860_098393
Vancouver
Alaka SA, Ngan SC, MacPherson REK, Pickett W, Chen C, Sze N. Enhancing Dementia Risk Prediction with Heart Rate and Machine Learning in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz70860_098393. PMID: 41434961.
BibTeX
@article{alaka2025-41434961,
author = {Alaka, Shakiru A. and Ngan, SoFong Cam and MacPherson, Rebecca E. K. and Pickett, William and Chen, Christopher and Sze, Newman},
title = {{Enhancing Dementia Risk Prediction with Heart Rate and Machine Learning in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)}},
journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1002/alz70860_098393},
pmid = {41434961},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70860_098393}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Among the 18,013 participants with complete data for analysis, 516 (2.86%) exhibited cognitive impairment.
- Incorporating RHR into the CAIDE model led to a significant improvement in predictive accuracy.
- Random forest models with RHR achieved an AUC of 0.67 and an MCC of 0.32 in training data, compared to 0.65 and 0.29 in the test data.
- Similarly, support vector machines demonstrated a 2-3% increase in both AUC and MCC with the inclusion of RHR.
- The addition of resting heart rate significantly improves the predictive accuracy of the CAIDE model, particularly when using machine learning methods.
Why it matters
Adding resting heart rate to the CAIDE model improved predictive accuracy for cognitive impairment, with random forest models reaching an AUC of 0.67 in training and 0.65 in test data. This is about improving risk prediction and monitoring, not treating, curing or preventing dementia.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →
Study details
- Study designlongitudinal study
- Participants27,768
- Effect size2.86%
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 51/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 49 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 51 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia) |
| Journal's citation record | 2 / 4 | Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 7 / 12 | A longitudinal study following the same people over time |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 4 / 4 | 27,768 participants |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 1 / 7 | Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025 |
| Impact for its field and year | 1 / 6 | Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Newman Sze holds only 5 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | 0 / 3 | National University Health System: institution h-index 485 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 2 countries |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41434961) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 49 / 96 | Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 49 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 51 out of 100. |
| Total | 51 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1002/alz70860_098393
- PubMed: 41434961
- Original source →
- Free full text: Alzheimer s & Dementia →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Related studies in Digital health tools
Also tagged “biobank”
1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.