Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Among the 18,013 participants with complete data for analysis, 516 (2.86%) exhibited cognitive impairment. Incorporating RHR into the CAIDE model led to a significant improvement in predictive accuracy. Random forest models with RHR achieved an AUC of 0.67 and an MCC of 0.32 in training data, compared to 0.65 and 0.29 in the test data. Similarly, support vector machines demonstrated a 2-3% increase in both AUC and MCC with the inclusion of RHR. The addition of resting heart rate significantly improves the predictive accuracy of the CAIDE model, particularly when using machine learning methods. This highlights the potential of this approach to enhance traditional risk models, enabling more precise dementia risk assessments, closer monitoring, and the implementation of preventive strategies.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Alaka, S. A., Ngan, S. C., MacPherson, R. E. K., Pickett, W., Chen, C., & Sze, N. (2025). Enhancing Dementia Risk Prediction with Heart Rate and Machine Learning in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70860_098393

Vancouver

Alaka SA, Ngan SC, MacPherson REK, Pickett W, Chen C, Sze N. Enhancing Dementia Risk Prediction with Heart Rate and Machine Learning in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz70860_098393. PMID: 41434961.

BibTeX

@article{alaka2025-41434961,
  author  = {Alaka, Shakiru A. and Ngan, SoFong Cam and MacPherson, Rebecca E. K. and Pickett, William and Chen, Christopher and Sze, Newman},
  title   = {{Enhancing Dementia Risk Prediction with Heart Rate and Machine Learning in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz70860_098393},
  pmid    = {41434961},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70860_098393}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Adding resting heart rate to the CAIDE model improved predictive accuracy for cognitive impairment, with random forest models reaching an AUC of 0.67 in training and 0.65 in test data. This is about improving risk prediction and monitoring, not treating, curing or preventing dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 51/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 49 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 51 of 100. Total 51 of 100.49 of the 96 points we could judge = 51 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 49 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 51 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 27,768 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Newman Sze holds only 5 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 National University Health System: institution h-index 485 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41434961)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 49 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 49 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 51 out of 100.
Total 51 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Related studies in Digital health tools

Also tagged “biobank”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →