Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 55 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Background The purpose of this study was to assess the five-year treatment effects of a short course of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer disease (AD). Methods Fifty subjects 50 to 84 years of age with MCI due to AD were administered 0.4 g/kg 10% IVIG or 0.9% saline every two weeks x five doses in a randomized double-blinded design as part of a two-year study. Twenty-seven subjects completed an additional three-year extension study. MRI brain imaging, cognitive testing, and conversion to dementia were assessed annually. Participants were stratified into early MCI (E-MCI) and late MCI (L-MCI). The primary endpoint was brain atrophy measured as annualized percent change in ventricular volume (APCV) annually for five years. ANOVA was used to compare annualized percent change in ventricular volume from baseline between the groups adjusting for MCI status (E-MCI, L-MCI). Results Differences in brain atrophy between the groups, which were statistically significant after one year, were no longer significant after five years. IVIG-treated L-MCI subjects did demonstrate a delay in conversion to dementia of 21.4 weeks. Conclusion An eight-week course of IVIG totaling 2 g/kg in MCI is safe but is not sufficient to sustain an initial reduction in brain atrophy or a temporary delay in conversion to dementia at five years. Other dosing strategies of IVIG in the early stages of AD should be investigated to assess more sustainable disease-modifying effects. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01300728. Registered 23 February 2011.

Key findings

Why it matters

A short course of IVIG in people with mild cognitive impairment was safe, but its early effect on brain atrophy was gone by five years. Any delay in conversion to dementia was temporary and did not last.

Study details

How this study scored 55/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 2 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 53 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 55 of 100. Total 55 of 100.53 of the 96 points we could judge = 55 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for sample size because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 53 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 55 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BMC neuroscience)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 BMC Neuroscience: journal h-index 135 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial (from PubMed type “Randomized Controlled Trial”)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomised / blinded 2 / 2 Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 5 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 7 year(s) since 2021
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Azad Ghassemi holds only 3 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Sutter Health: institution h-index 135 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 34362303)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 53 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 53 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 55 out of 100.
Total 55 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Kile, S., Au, W., Parise, C., Rose, K., Donnel, T., Hankins, A., et al. (2021). Five-year outcomes after IVIG for mild cognitive impairment due to alzheimer disease. BMC neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-021-00651-2

Vancouver

Kile S, Au W, Parise C, Rose K, Donnel T, Hankins A, et al. Five-year outcomes after IVIG for mild cognitive impairment due to alzheimer disease. BMC neuroscience. 2021. doi:10.1186/s12868-021-00651-2. PMID: 34362303.

BibTeX

@article{kile2021-34362303,
  author  = {Kile, S. and Au, W. and Parise, C. and Rose, K. and Donnel, T. and Hankins, A. and Au, Y. and Chan, M. and others},
  title   = {{Five-year outcomes after IVIG for mild cognitive impairment due to alzheimer disease}},
  journal = {BMC neuroscience},
  year    = {2021},
  doi     = {10.1186/s12868-021-00651-2},
  pmid    = {34362303},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-021-00651-2}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “assessment”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assessment”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →