Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Prevention trials

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract With respect to brain aging, there has been particular emphasis in the literature on three named diet patterns, DASH, the “Mediterranean” diet, and the MIND diet. Between 1980 and 2024, 139 human observational or intervention studies were published that examined the role of these individual dietary patterns in brain aging. When systematically reviewed using the USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review method and an a priori established protocol, a common theme emerged: diets characterized by higher consumption of vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, fish, seafood, and unsaturated vegetable oils, alongside lower intake of red and processed meats and sugar-sweetened beverages, are consistently associated with a reduced risk of cognitive decline and dementia. However, a significant knowledge gap remains regarding the critical timing and duration of dietary pattern consumption in early adulthood for the prevention of cognitive decline. Furthermore, the biological mechanisms responsible for the cognitive protective effects of these diets remain unclear. Ultimately, it is important to understand the underlying mechanisms of select nutritional factors found within healthy dietary patterns that are not sufficiently consumed in the U.S. population yet show promise in delaying various aspects of brain aging.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Booth, S. L. (2025). Dietary Patterns and Risk of Age-Related Cognitive Decline and Dementia: Enthusiasm Before Evidence? Innovation in Aging. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1872

Vancouver

Booth SL. Dietary Patterns and Risk of Age-Related Cognitive Decline and Dementia: Enthusiasm Before Evidence? Innovation in Aging. 2025. doi:10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1872.

BibTeX

@article{booth2025-f7c16b6d,
  author  = {Booth, Sarah L.},
  title   = {{Dietary Patterns and Risk of Age-Related Cognitive Decline and Dementia: Enthusiasm Before Evidence?}},
  journal = {Innovation in Aging},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1872},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1872}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This systematic review of 139 studies found that diets higher in vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, fish, seafood, and unsaturated vegetable oils, with lower intake of red and processed meats and sugar-sweetened beverages, are consistently associated with reduced risk of cognitive decline and dementia. It notes a significant knowledge gap about the critical timing and duration of dietary pattern consumption in early adulthood and that the biological mechanisms remain unclear.

Study details

How this study scored 45/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 45 of 100.45 of 100 points earned55 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a systematic review of all the studies on the question. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported and studied in people because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Innovation in Aging)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Innovation in Aging: journal h-index 48 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 12 / 12 A systematic review of all the studies on the question
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomization is not credited here
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Sarah L. Booth: h-index 73 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Tufts University: institution h-index 1,045 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 45 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Prevention trials

Also tagged “incidence”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “incidence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Prevention trials

See all studies in Prevention trials →