Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 36 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Plain-language summary

Rivastigmine (1), an acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor approved in 2000 for the treatment of Alzheimer disease, bears a carbamate moiety in its structure, which is able to react covalently with the active site of the enzyme. Kinetic and structural studies on the interaction of 1 with different cholinesterases have been published, giving deeper, but not definitive, insights on the catalysis mechanism. On the basis of these findings and in connection with our previous studies on a series of benzopyrano[4,3-b]pyrrole carbamates as AChE inhibitors, we designed a series of conformationally restricted analogues of 1 by including the dimethylamino-alpha-methylbenzyl moiety in different tricyclic systems. A superimposition between the conformation of 1 and the carbon derivative 4, as obtained from Monte Carlo simulations, supported the idea that the tricyclic derivatives might act as rigid analogues of 1. The biological profile of 4-9, assessed in vitro against human AChE and BChE, validated our rational design. Compound 5, bearing a sulfur-containing system, showed the highest inhibitory activity, being 192-fold more potent than 1. In the present study, the most potent inhibitors were always methyl derivatives 3-5, endowed with a nanomolar range potency, whereas the ethyl ones were 40 times less potent. A reasonable explanation for this finding might be a steric hindrance effect between the ethyl group of 1 and His440 in the active site, as already suggested by the crystal structure of the complex AChE/1. The unfavorable influence of the carbamic N-alkyl chain on AChE inhibition is less striking when considering BChE inhibition, since BChE is characterized by a bigger acyl binding pocket than AChE. In fact, methyl carbamates 3-5 did not show AChE/BChE selectivity, whereas compounds 6-9 were significantly more potent in inhibiting BChE than AChE activity. At 100 microM, 5 was found to inhibit the AChE-induced aggregation only by 19% likely because it is not able to strongly interact with the peripheral anionic site of AChE, which plays an essential role in the Abeta aggregation mediated by the enzyme but is lacking in BChE structure.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Bolognesi, M. L., Bartolini, M., Cavalli, A., Andrisano, V., Rosini, M., Minarini, A., et al. (2004). Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of conformationally restricted rivastigmine analogues. Journal of medicinal chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm049782n

Vancouver

Bolognesi ML, Bartolini M, Cavalli A, Andrisano V, Rosini M, Minarini A, et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of conformationally restricted rivastigmine analogues. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2004. doi:10.1021/jm049782n. PMID: 15537349.

BibTeX

@article{bolognesi2004-15537349,
  author  = {Bolognesi, M. L. and Bartolini, M. and Cavalli, A. and Andrisano, V. and Rosini, M. and Minarini, A. and Melchiorre, C.},
  title   = {{Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of conformationally restricted rivastigmine analogues}},
  journal = {Journal of medicinal chemistry},
  year    = {2004},
  doi     = {10.1021/jm049782n},
  pmid    = {15537349},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1021/jm049782n}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 36/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 21 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 36 of 100. Total 36 of 100.21 of the 58 points we could judge = 36 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of medicinal chemistry)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2004 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 15537349)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 21 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100.
Total 36 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Treatments from nearby years

Also tagged “design-synthesis”

2 studies in the library carry the topic tag “design-synthesis”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 2 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →