Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

This study aimed to develop a conversion table for the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-J) to the Japanese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-J) to facilitate prediction of the MMSE-J score from the MoCA-J score. Participants (N = 121) were community-dwelling older adults (M = 74.12, SD = 4.73, age 61–84) who were able to visit the university laboratory alone, having no diagnosis of dementia. Their cognitive performance was assessed by MoCA-J and MMSE-J. We developed the MMSE-J conversion table from the row MoCA-J scores using the equipercentile equating with log-linear smoothing. A Bland-Altman plot displayed a nonsignificant systematic bias between the raw and converted MMSE scores. The conversion table presented high accuracy, with 85.8% of converted MMSE-J scores falling within two points of raw scores. In addition, our conversion table demonstrated the advantage of using the MoCA-J for early detection of cognitive decline.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Iwasaki, S., Yamashita, M., Takamatsu, R., Toyoshima, A., Nishiguchi, S., Yamada, M., et al. (2025). CONVERTING MOCA-J TO MMSE-J IN COMMUNITY-DWELLING JAPANESE OLDER ADULTS: A PILOT STUDY. PSYCHOLOGIA. https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2023-b046

Vancouver

Iwasaki S, Yamashita M, Takamatsu R, Toyoshima A, Nishiguchi S, Yamada M, et al. CONVERTING MOCA-J TO MMSE-J IN COMMUNITY-DWELLING JAPANESE OLDER ADULTS: A PILOT STUDY. PSYCHOLOGIA. 2025. doi:10.2117/psysoc.2023-b046.

BibTeX

@article{iwasaki2025-1729f09b,
  author  = {Iwasaki, Shoko and Yamashita, Masatoshi and Takamatsu, Reina and Toyoshima, Aya and Nishiguchi, Shu and Yamada, Minoru and Sekiyama, Kaoru},
  title   = {{CONVERTING MOCA-J TO MMSE-J IN COMMUNITY-DWELLING JAPANESE OLDER ADULTS: A PILOT STUDY}},
  journal = {PSYCHOLOGIA},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.2117/psysoc.2023-b046},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2023-b046}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This pilot study created a table to convert MoCA-J scores into MMSE-J scores in community-dwelling older Japanese adults without dementia. It is a cognitive screening tool and does not address treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 39/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 39 of 100.39 of 100 points earned61 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (PSYCHOLOGIA)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 PSYCHOLOGIA: journal h-index 35 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 121 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Kaoru Sekiyama: h-index 24 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Kyoto University: institution h-index 1,156 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 7 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 39 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 14.

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment from nearby years

Also tagged “palliative”

858 studies in the library carry the topic tag “palliative”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 858 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →