Home › Research › Treatments
Continuous CSF drainage in AD: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study
Silverberg GD, Mayo M, Saul T, Fellmann J, Carvalho J, McGuire D.. Neurology, 2008-06-04
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Background Alzheimer disease (AD) has been associated with abnormal cerebral clearance of macromolecules, such as amyloid and microtubule-associated-protein tau (MAP-tau). We hypothesized that improving clearance of macromolecules from the CNS might slow the progression of dementia. Objective This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of a surgically implanted shunt in subjects with probable AD. Methods A total of 215 subjects with probable AD by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria received either a low-flow ventriculoperitoneal shunt or a sham (occluded) shunt for 9 months. Longitudinal CSF sampling was performed in both active and control subjects. Primary outcome measures were the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and the Global Deterioration Scale. CSF Abeta((1-42)) and MAP-tau also were assayed. Results After a planned interim analysis, the study was halted for futility. Using the intent-to-treat population, no between-group differences were observed in the primary outcome measures. The surgical procedure and device were associated with 12 CNS infections, some temporally associated with CSF sampling. All were treated successfully. Conclusions We found no benefit to low-flow CSF shunting in subjects with mild to severe Alzheimer disease. CSF infections, while treatable, occurred more frequently than expected, in some cases likely related to CSF sampling.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Silverberg, G. D., Mayo, M., Saul, T., Fellmann, J., Carvalho, J., & McGuire, D. (2008). Continuous CSF drainage in AD: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000316197.04157.6f
Vancouver
Silverberg GD, Mayo M, Saul T, Fellmann J, Carvalho J, McGuire D. Continuous CSF drainage in AD: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Neurology. 2008. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000316197.04157.6f. PMID: 18525029.
BibTeX
@article{silverberg2008-18525029,
author = {Silverberg, G. D. and Mayo, M. and Saul, T. and Fellmann, J. and Carvalho, J. and McGuire, D.},
title = {{Continuous CSF drainage in AD: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study}},
journal = {Neurology},
year = {2008},
doi = {10.1212/01.wnl.0000316197.04157.6f},
pmid = {18525029},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000316197.04157.6f}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Background Alzheimer disease (AD) has been associated with abnormal cerebral clearance of macromolecules, such as amyloid and microtubule-associated-protein tau (MAP-tau).
- Results After a planned interim analysis, the study was halted for futility.
- The surgical procedure and device were associated with 12 CNS infections, some temporally associated with CSF sampling.
- Conclusions We found no benefit to low-flow CSF shunting in subjects with mild to severe Alzheimer disease.
Why it matters
In 215 people with probable Alzheimer's disease, a low-flow ventriculoperitoneal shunt showed no benefit, the study was halted for futility, and there were 12 CNS infections. This clearly found no benefit for this surgical approach.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Study designlongitudinal study
- Participants215
- Evidence strengthHigh
How this study scored 64/100
Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 9 / 10 | Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology) |
| Journal's citation record | 4 / 4 | Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 11 / 12 | A randomised controlled trial (from PubMed type “Randomized Controlled Trial”) |
| Strength of evidence | 5 / 5 | Rated “high” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2008 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 215 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 2 / 2 | Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record) |
| Times cited | 4 / 7 | Cited 87 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 2 / 5 | 4.3 citations a year over 20 year(s) since 2008 |
| Impact for its field and year | 2 / 6 | Cited 2.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 1 / 6 | Cited by 1 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 1 / 4 | Cited 14 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 2 / 4 | Last-listed author Dawn McGuire: h-index 21 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 1 / 3 | Brown University: institution h-index 1,120 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | PubMed indexes it as a multicentre study |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 18525029) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Total | 64 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 10 Oct 2026), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.
Related studies in Treatments
Also in Treatments
166 studies in the library are filed under Treatments with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Treatments hub.