Home › Research › Treatments
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial on cannabinoid-based medication for behavioural disorders in old patients with severe dementia: the study results
Federica Bianchi, Barbara Broers, Jules Alexandre Desmeules, Angeline Langlois, James Wampfler, François Curtin, Sophie Pautex. Age and ageing, 2026-08-03
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Background Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are frequent in patients with severe dementia and represent a major clinical challenge. Cannabinoid-based medications (CBM) have been proposed as a possible therapeutic option, but clinical evidence is still limited. Methods We performed a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in five long-term care facilities in Geneva, Switzerland. Patients with severe dementia received oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) oil (1:2 ratio, up to 20 mg/40 mg daily) and placebo in two 8-week periods separated by a 1-week washout. The primary outcome was agitation measured by the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI). Secondary outcomes included behavioural scales, pain, as-needed psychotropic medication use and safety. Results Twenty-five patients (average age 83 years) were randomised, and nineteen completed both study periods. No significant difference was observed between active treatment and placebo for the CMAI and other main behavioural outcomes. However, the use of pro re nata psychotropic medications was significantly lower during the active treatment period. The treatment was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events related to the study drug were observed. Conclusions In this real-life crossover study, THC/CBD oil did not show superiority over placebo in reducing agitation in severe dementia. However, it was safe and associated with a significant reduction in the use of as-needed psychotropic medications prescribed for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. CBM may represent a possible adjunctive option in selected patients, but further studies are needed.
Key findings
- Results Twenty-five patients (average age 83 years) were randomised, and nineteen completed both study periods.
- No significant difference was observed between active treatment and placebo for the CMAI and other main behavioural outcomes.
- However, the use of pro re nata psychotropic medications was significantly lower during the active treatment period.
- However, it was safe and associated with a significant reduction in the use of as-needed psychotropic medications prescribed for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.
Why it matters
In this small trial of 25 patients with severe dementia, a THC/CBD oil did not work better than placebo for agitation or other main behavioural outcomes. The treatment was well tolerated and was linked to less use of as-needed psychotropic medication, but the trial was small and the main outcomes were negative.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Study designRCT
- Participants25
- Effect sizeNo significant difference vs placebo on the CMAI (primary outcome); numeric estimate not reported in the abstract
- Evidence strengthNull-result
Limitations
Very small sample with 24% attrition; crossover design in a progressive illness; single city; effect sizes for the primary outcome are not reported in the abstract.
How this study scored 57/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 56 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 57 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Age and ageing) |
| Journal's citation record | 2 / 4 | Age and Ageing: journal h-index 231 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 11 / 12 | A randomised controlled trial |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “null-result” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 1 / 4 | 25 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | Effect described in words only — scores zero |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 2 / 2 | Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record) |
| Times cited | 1 / 7 | Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 1 / 5 | 1.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026 |
| Impact for its field and year | 4 / 6 | Cited 8.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 2 / 4 | Last-listed author Sophie Pautex: h-index 28 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 1 / 3 | University of Geneva: institution h-index 1,049 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42613673) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 56 / 98 | Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 56 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 57 out of 100. |
| Total | 57 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Bianchi, F., Broers, B., Desmeules, J. A., Langlois, A., Wampfler, J., Curtin, F., et al. (2026). A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial on cannabinoid-based medication for behavioural disorders in old patients with severe dementia: the study results. Age and ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag239
Vancouver
Bianchi F, Broers B, Desmeules JA, Langlois A, Wampfler J, Curtin F, et al. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial on cannabinoid-based medication for behavioural disorders in old patients with severe dementia: the study results. Age and ageing. 2026. doi:10.1093/ageing/afag239. PMID: 42613673.
BibTeX
@article{bianchi2026-42613673,
author = {Bianchi, Federica and Broers, Barbara and Desmeules, Jules Alexandre and Langlois, Angeline and Wampfler, James and Curtin, François and Pautex, Sophie},
title = {{A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial on cannabinoid-based medication for behavioural disorders in old patients with severe dementia: the study results}},
journal = {Age and ageing},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1093/ageing/afag239},
pmid = {42613673},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag239}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.