Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 57 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are frequent in patients with severe dementia and represent a major clinical challenge. Cannabinoid-based medications (CBM) have been proposed as a possible therapeutic option, but clinical evidence is still limited. Methods We performed a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in five long-term care facilities in Geneva, Switzerland. Patients with severe dementia received oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) oil (1:2 ratio, up to 20 mg/40 mg daily) and placebo in two 8-week periods separated by a 1-week washout. The primary outcome was agitation measured by the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI). Secondary outcomes included behavioural scales, pain, as-needed psychotropic medication use and safety. Results Twenty-five patients (average age 83 years) were randomised, and nineteen completed both study periods. No significant difference was observed between active treatment and placebo for the CMAI and other main behavioural outcomes. However, the use of pro re nata psychotropic medications was significantly lower during the active treatment period. The treatment was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events related to the study drug were observed. Conclusions In this real-life crossover study, THC/CBD oil did not show superiority over placebo in reducing agitation in severe dementia. However, it was safe and associated with a significant reduction in the use of as-needed psychotropic medications prescribed for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. CBM may represent a possible adjunctive option in selected patients, but further studies are needed.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this small trial of 25 patients with severe dementia, a THC/CBD oil did not work better than placebo for agitation or other main behavioural outcomes. The treatment was well tolerated and was linked to less use of as-needed psychotropic medication, but the trial was small and the main outcomes were negative.

Study details

Limitations

Very small sample with 24% attrition; crossover design in a progressive illness; single city; effect sizes for the primary outcome are not reported in the abstract.

How this study scored 57/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 2 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 56 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 57 of 100. Total 57 of 100.56 of the 98 points we could judge = 57 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 56 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 57 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Age and ageing)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Age and Ageing: journal h-index 231 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “null-result” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 25 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 Effect described in words only — scores zero
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 2 / 2 Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 8.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Sophie Pautex: h-index 28 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Geneva: institution h-index 1,049 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42613673)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 56 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 56 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 57 out of 100.
Total 57 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Bianchi, F., Broers, B., Desmeules, J. A., Langlois, A., Wampfler, J., Curtin, F., et al. (2026). A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial on cannabinoid-based medication for behavioural disorders in old patients with severe dementia: the study results. Age and ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag239

Vancouver

Bianchi F, Broers B, Desmeules JA, Langlois A, Wampfler J, Curtin F, et al. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial on cannabinoid-based medication for behavioural disorders in old patients with severe dementia: the study results. Age and ageing. 2026. doi:10.1093/ageing/afag239. PMID: 42613673.

BibTeX

@article{bianchi2026-42613673,
  author  = {Bianchi, Federica and Broers, Barbara and Desmeules, Jules Alexandre and Langlois, Angeline and Wampfler, James and Curtin, François and Pautex, Sophie},
  title   = {{A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial on cannabinoid-based medication for behavioural disorders in old patients with severe dementia: the study results}},
  journal = {Age and ageing},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1093/ageing/afag239},
  pmid    = {42613673},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag239}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Treatments

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →