Home › Research › Brain scans and imaging
Computational Insight into the Binding Profile of the Second-Generation PET Tracer PI2620 with Tau Fibrils
Kuang G, Murugan NA, Zhou Y, Nordberg A, Ågren H.. ACS chemical neuroscience, 2020-02-28
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Abnormal deposition of hyperphosphorylated tau as neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) is an important pathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and of other neurodegenerative disorders. A noninvasive positron emission tomography (PET) tracer that quantifies neurofibrillary tangles in vivo can enhance the clinical diagnosis of AD and can also be used to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutics aimed at reducing the abnormal aggregation of the tau fibril in the brain. In this paper, we study the binding profile of fibrillar tau aggregates with a PET tracer PI2620, which is a new second generation tau PET tracer that is presently experimentally and clinically studied. The target structure for the tau fibril is based on cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure. A multiscale simulation workflow including molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, metadynamics simulation, and free energy calculations was implemented. We find that PI2620 can bind to eight surface binding sites, three core binding sites, and one entry site. The binding at the core sites and entry site is found to be much more favorable than that on the surface sites due to stronger hydrophobic interactions and less solvent exposure. Furthermore, the entry site which is formed by the terminal β-sheets of the fibril is found to have the highest binding affinity to PI2620. Importantly, the binding capacity at the entry site can be much higher than that at other core sites, due to its easy accessibility. Therefore, the entry site is believed to be the major binding site for PI2620. A previous computational study on tracers with tau fibrils reports a maximum of four binding sites. Through use of methods that allow us to locate "cryptic binding sites", we report here additional core sites available for binding and we address the limitation of using the cryo-EM structure alone for structure-based tracer design. Our results could be helpful for elucidating the binding mechanism of imaging tracers with the fibrillar form of tau, a knowledge that in turn can be used to guide the development of compounds with higher affinity and selectivity for tau using structure-based design strategies.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Kuang, G., Murugan, N. A., Zhou, Y., Nordberg, A., & Ågren, H. (2020). Computational Insight into the Binding Profile of the Second-Generation PET Tracer PI2620 with Tau Fibrils. ACS chemical neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00578
Vancouver
Kuang G, Murugan NA, Zhou Y, Nordberg A, Ågren H. Computational Insight into the Binding Profile of the Second-Generation PET Tracer PI2620 with Tau Fibrils. ACS chemical neuroscience. 2020. doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00578. PMID: 32069017.
BibTeX
@article{kuang2020-32069017,
author = {Kuang, G. and Murugan, N. A. and Zhou, Y. and Nordberg, A. and Ågren, H.},
title = {{Computational Insight into the Binding Profile of the Second-Generation PET Tracer PI2620 with Tau Fibrils}},
journal = {ACS chemical neuroscience},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00578},
pmid = {32069017},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00578}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Our results could be helpful for elucidating the binding mechanism of imaging tracers with the fibrillar form of tau, a knowledge that in turn can be used to guide the development of compounds with higher affinity and selectivity for tau using structure-based design strategies.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 38/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 38 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (ACS chemical neuroscience) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 32069017) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 22 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 38 out of 100. |
| Total | 38 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Brain scans and imaging
Also tagged “second-generation”
2 studies in the library carry the topic tag “second-generation”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 2 tagged studies.