Home › Research › Digital health tools
Comparison of Feature Selection Techniques in Machine Learning for Anatomical Brain MRI in Dementia
Tohka J, Moradi E, Huttunen H, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.. Neuroinformatics, 2016-07-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
We present a comparative split-half resampling analysis of various data driven feature selection and classification methods for the whole brain voxel-based classification analysis of anatomical magnetic resonance images. We compared support vector machines (SVMs), with or without filter based feature selection, several embedded feature selection methods and stability selection. While comparisons of the accuracy of various classification methods have been reported previously, the variability of the out-of-training sample classification accuracy and the set of selected features due to independent training and test sets have not been previously addressed in a brain imaging context. We studied two classification problems: 1) Alzheimer's disease (AD) vs. normal control (NC) and 2) mild cognitive impairment (MCI) vs. NC classification. In AD vs. NC classification, the variability in the test accuracy due to the subject sample did not vary between different methods and exceeded the variability due to different classifiers. In MCI vs. NC classification, particularly with a large training set, embedded feature selection methods outperformed SVM-based ones with the difference in the test accuracy exceeding the test accuracy variability due to the subject sample. The filter and embedded methods produced divergent feature patterns for MCI vs. NC classification that suggests the utility of the embedded feature selection for this problem when linked with the good generalization performance. The stability of the feature sets was strongly correlated with the number of features selected, weakly correlated with the stability of classification accuracy, and uncorrelated with the average classification accuracy.
Key findings
- NC classification, the variability in the test accuracy due to the subject sample did not vary between different methods and exceeded the variability due to different classifiers.
- NC classification, particularly with a large training set, embedded feature selection methods outperformed SVM-based ones with the difference in the test accuracy exceeding the test accuracy variability due to the subject sample.
- The filter and embedded methods produced divergent feature patterns for MCI vs.
- NC classification that suggests the utility of the embedded feature selection for this problem when linked with the good generalization performance.
- The stability of the feature sets was strongly correlated with the number of features selected, weakly correlated with the stability of classification accuracy, and uncorrelated with the average classification accuracy.
Why it matters
This study compared different machine learning feature selection methods for classifying brain MRI scans of people with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment and normal controls. It is a methods comparison for diagnosis, not a treatment, cure or prevention study.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 38/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neuroinformatics) |
| Journal's citation record | 1 / 4 | Neuroinformatics: journal h-index 83 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2016 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 4 / 7 | Cited 85 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 2 / 5 | 7.1 citations a year over 12 year(s) since 2016 |
| Impact for its field and year | 4 / 6 | Cited 9.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 2 / 6 | Cited by 3 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 1 / 4 | Cited 9 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 2 / 4 | Last-listed author Heikki J. Huttunen: h-index 26 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 0 / 3 | Tampere University of Technology: institution h-index 322 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 2 countries |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 26803769) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Total | 38 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Tohka, J., Moradi, E., Huttunen, H., & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. (2016). Comparison of Feature Selection Techniques in Machine Learning for Anatomical Brain MRI in Dementia. Neuroinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-015-9292-3
Vancouver
Tohka J, Moradi E, Huttunen H, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Comparison of Feature Selection Techniques in Machine Learning for Anatomical Brain MRI in Dementia. Neuroinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1007/s12021-015-9292-3. PMID: 26803769.
BibTeX
@article{tohka2016-26803769,
author = {Tohka, J. and Moradi, E. and Huttunen, H. and {Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative}},
title = {{Comparison of Feature Selection Techniques in Machine Learning for Anatomical Brain MRI in Dementia}},
journal = {Neuroinformatics},
year = {2016},
doi = {10.1007/s12021-015-9292-3},
pmid = {26803769},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-015-9292-3}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
3 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.
Related studies in Digital health tools
Also tagged “classification”
835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.