Home › Research › Digital health tools
A comparison of machine learning methods for survival analysis of high-dimensional clinical data for dementia prediction
Spooner A, Chen E, Sowmya A, Sachdev P, Kochan NA, Trollor J, Brodaty H.. Scientific reports, 2020-11-23
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Data collected from clinical trials and cohort studies, such as dementia studies, are often high-dimensional, censored, heterogeneous and contain missing information, presenting challenges to traditional statistical analysis. There is an urgent need for methods that can overcome these challenges to model this complex data. At present there is no cure for dementia and no treatment that can successfully change the course of the disease. Machine learning models that can predict the time until a patient develops dementia are important tools in helping understand dementia risks and can give more accurate results than traditional statistical methods when modelling high-dimensional, heterogeneous, clinical data. This work compares the performance and stability of ten machine learning algorithms, combined with eight feature selection methods, capable of performing survival analysis of high-dimensional, heterogeneous, clinical data. We developed models that predict survival to dementia using baseline data from two different studies. The Sydney Memory and Ageing Study (MAS) is a longitudinal cohort study of 1037 participants, aged 70-90 years, that aims to determine the effects of ageing on cognition. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is a longitudinal study aimed at identifying biomarkers for the early detection and tracking of Alzheimer's disease. Using the concordance index as a measure of performance, our models achieve maximum performance values of 0.82 for MAS and 0.93 For ADNI.
Key findings
- Machine learning models that can predict the time until a patient develops dementia are important tools in helping understand dementia risks and can give more accurate results than traditional statistical methods when modelling high-dimensional, heterogeneous, clinical data.
Why it matters
This study compared machine learning methods for survival analysis to predict time until dementia using clinical data. It notes there is no cure for dementia and no treatment that can change its course, and the work is about prediction models, not treatment or prevention.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →
Study details
- Study designcohort study
- Participants1,037
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 67/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Scientific reports) |
| Journal's citation record | 3 / 4 | Scientific Reports: journal h-index 463 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 7 / 12 | A cohort study following people over time |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 3 / 4 | 1,037 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 5 / 7 | Cited 282 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 4 / 5 | 35.2 citations a year over 8 year(s) since 2020 |
| Impact for its field and year | 5 / 6 | Cited 20.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 2 / 6 | Cited by 5 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 3 / 4 | Cited 151 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 4 / 4 | Last-listed author Henry Brodaty: h-index 127 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 1 / 3 | UNSW Sydney: institution h-index 1,101 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 33230128) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 67 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77220-w
- PubMed: 33230128
- Original source →
- Free full text: Scientific Reports →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Spooner, A., Chen, E., Sowmya, A., Sachdev, P., Kochan, N. A., Trollor, J., et al. (2020). A comparison of machine learning methods for survival analysis of high-dimensional clinical data for dementia prediction. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77220-w
Vancouver
Spooner A, Chen E, Sowmya A, Sachdev P, Kochan NA, Trollor J, et al. A comparison of machine learning methods for survival analysis of high-dimensional clinical data for dementia prediction. Scientific reports. 2020. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77220-w. PMID: 33230128.
BibTeX
@article{spooner2020-33230128,
author = {Spooner, A. and Chen, E. and Sowmya, A. and Sachdev, P. and Kochan, N. A. and Trollor, J. and Brodaty, H.},
title = {{A comparison of machine learning methods for survival analysis of high-dimensional clinical data for dementia prediction}},
journal = {Scientific reports},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-020-77220-w},
pmid = {33230128},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77220-w}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
5 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.
Related studies in Digital health tools
Also tagged “prevalence”
1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.