Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 63 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are likely to be most beneficial when initiated in the presymptomatic phase. To track the benefit of such interventions, fluid biomarkers are of great importance, with neurofilament light chain protein (NfL) showing promise for monitoring neurodegeneration and predicting cognitive outcomes. Here, we update and complement previous findings from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Observational Study by using matched cross-sectional and longitudinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma samples from 567 individuals, allowing timely comparative analyses of CSF and blood trajectories across the entire disease spectrum. CSF and plasma trajectories were similar at presymptomatic stages, discriminating mutation carriers from non-carrier controls 10-20 years before the estimated onset of clinical symptoms, depending on the statistical model used. However, after symptom onset the rate of change in CSF NfL continued to increase steadily, whereas the rate of change in plasma NfL leveled off. Both plasma and CSF NfL changes were associated with grey-matter atrophy, but not with Aβ-PET changes, supporting a temporal decoupling of Aβ deposition and neurodegeneration. These observations support NfL in both CSF and blood as an early marker of neurodegeneration but suggest that NfL measured in the CSF may be better suited for monitoring clinical trial outcomes in symptomatic AD patients.

Key findings

Why it matters

In autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease, cerebrospinal fluid and plasma neurofilament light chain trajectories were similar at presymptomatic stages and discriminated mutation carriers from non-carrier controls 10-20 years before estimated symptom onset, but after symptom onset the rate of change in cerebrospinal fluid continued to increase while the rate in plasma leveled off. Both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid changes were associated with grey-matter atrophy but not with Aβ-PET changes, supporting neurofilament light chain in both fluids as an early marker of neurodegeneration, though this concerns monitoring rather than treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 63/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 0 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 63 of 100.63 of 100 points earned37 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Nature communications)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Nature Communications: journal h-index 747 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 567 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 34 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 8.5 citations a year over 4 year(s) since 2024
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 8.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 4 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 34 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 0 / 4 Last-listed author Jacqueline Rizzo: h-index 3 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 40 institution(s) in 9 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39557867)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 63 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Hofmann, A., Häsler, L. M., Lambert, M., Kaeser, S. A., Gräber-Sultan, S., Obermüller, U., et al. (2024). Comparative neurofilament light chain trajectories in CSF and plasma in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease. Nature communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52937-8

Vancouver

Hofmann A, Häsler LM, Lambert M, Kaeser SA, Gräber-Sultan S, Obermüller U, et al. Comparative neurofilament light chain trajectories in CSF and plasma in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease. Nature communications. 2024. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52937-8. PMID: 39557867.

BibTeX

@article{hofmann2024-39557867,
  author  = {Hofmann, A. and Häsler, L. M. and Lambert, M. and Kaeser, S. A. and Gräber-Sultan, S. and Obermüller, U. and Kuder-Buletta, E. and la Fougere, C. and others},
  title   = {{Comparative neurofilament light chain trajectories in CSF and plasma in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Nature communications},
  year    = {2024},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41467-024-52937-8},
  pmid    = {39557867},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52937-8}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 16.

Later studies that cite this one

4 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “biomarkers”

821 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biomarkers”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 821 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →