Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100. Long-term cohort studies

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Neurofilament light (NfL) is a marker of neuroaxonal injury, a prominent feature of Alzheimer's disease. It remains uncertain, however, how it relates to amyloid and tau pathology or neurodegeneration across the Alzheimer's disease continuum. The aim of this study was to investigate how plasma NfL relates to amyloid and tau PET and MRI measures of brain atrophy in participants with and without cognitive impairment.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Benedet, A. L., Leuzy, A., Pascoal, T. A., Ashton, N. J., Mathotaarachchi, S., Savard, M., et al. (2020). Stage-specific links between plasma neurofilament light and imaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. Brain : a journal of neurology. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa342

Vancouver

Benedet AL, Leuzy A, Pascoal TA, Ashton NJ, Mathotaarachchi S, Savard M, et al. Stage-specific links between plasma neurofilament light and imaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. Brain : a journal of neurology. 2020. doi:10.1093/brain/awaa342. PMID: 33210117.

BibTeX

@article{benedet2020-33210117,
  author  = {Benedet, A. L. and Leuzy, A. and Pascoal, T. A. and Ashton, N. J. and Mathotaarachchi, S. and Savard, M. and Therriault, J. and Kang, M. S. and others},
  title   = {{Stage-specific links between plasma neurofilament light and imaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Brain : a journal of neurology},
  year    = {2020},
  doi     = {10.1093/brain/awaa342},
  pmid    = {33210117},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa342}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Neurofilament light (NfL) is a blood marker of nerve-fibre injury. This study looked back at 1,149 people in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (382 without cognitive problems, 420 with mild cognitive impairment, 347 with Alzheimer's dementia). It asked how blood NfL, measured over time, relates to amyloid and tau PET scans and to MRI measures of brain shrinkage. It is an observational analysis of associations, so it cannot show that NfL causes or changes the course of the disease, and it does not on its own establish NfL as a diagnostic test.

Study details

How this study scored 65/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 62 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 65 of 100. Total 65 of 100.62 of the 96 points we could judge = 65 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 62 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 65 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Brain : a journal of neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Brain: journal h-index 503 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,149 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 123 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 15.4 citations a year over 8 year(s) since 2020
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 9.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 9 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 64 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University College London: institution h-index 2,029 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 16 institution(s) in 4 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 33210117)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 62 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 62 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 65 out of 100.
Total 65 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 15.

Later studies that cite this one

9 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Long-term cohort studies

Also tagged “biomarkers”

821 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biomarkers”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 821 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Long-term cohort studies

See all studies in Long-term cohort studies →