Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is marked by progressive cognitive decline, highlighting the importance of cognitive assessment in both clinical practice and research. This study investigates the temporal dynamics of cognitive decline and the differential sensitivity of cognitive measures across the AD spectrum. Cognitive measures, functional assessments, and amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau positron emission tomography (PET) scans from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) are analyzed using a latent-time disease progression model. Data from 1,447 participants across cognitively normal, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia stages are positioned along an estimated AD timeline. The model estimates a ∼20-year progression from initial Aβ PET positivity to late-stage dementia. Cognitive trajectories reveal that cognitive measures deviate at different time points, with varying levels of abnormality across the disease continuum. These findings demonstrate that cognitive measures differ markedly in their sensitivity across the AD continuum. Characterizing when specific measures become abnormal provides a framework for stage-appropriate test selection in clinical practice, improving clinical interpretation while informing the choice of cognitive endpoints and inclusion criteria in clinical trials.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Öhman, F., Raket, L. L., Schöll, M., & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. (2026). Cognitive Trajectories from Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease to Dementia. Advanced Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202518124

Vancouver

Öhman F, Raket LL, Schöll M, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Cognitive Trajectories from Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease to Dementia. Advanced Science. 2026. doi:10.1002/advs.202518124. PMID: 41910174.

BibTeX

@article{ohman2026-41910174,
  author  = {Öhman, Fredrik and Raket, Lars Lau and Schöll, Michael and {Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative}},
  title   = {{Cognitive Trajectories from Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease to Dementia}},
  journal = {Advanced Science},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1002/advs.202518124},
  pmid    = {41910174},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202518124}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Using data from 1,447 participants, this study modeled cognitive decline over about 20 years from amyloid positivity to dementia and found that different cognitive measures become abnormal at different times. This may help guide test selection and trial design but does not provide a treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 46/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 46 of 100.46 of 100 points earned54 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Advanced Science)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Advanced Science: journal h-index 282 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,447 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 9.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: h-index 12 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Lund University: institution h-index 1,119 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41910174)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 46 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 15.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also in Getting a diagnosis

141 studies in the library are filed under Getting a diagnosis with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Getting a diagnosis hub.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →