Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 56 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Objective To determine whether a digital clock-drawing test, DCTclock, improves upon standard cognitive assessments for discriminating diagnostic groups and for detecting biomarker evidence of amyloid and tau pathology in clinically normal older adults (CN). Methods Participants from the Harvard Aging Brain Study and the PET laboratory at Massachusetts General Hospital were recruited to undergo the DCTclock, standard neuropsychological assessments including the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC), and amyloid/tau PET imaging. Receiver operating curve analyses were used to assess diagnostic and biomarker discriminability. Logistic regression and partial correlations were used to assess DCTclock performance in relation to PACC and PET biomarkers. Results A total of 300 participants were studied. Among the 264 CN participants, 143 had amyloid and tau PET imaging (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] 0, Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] 28.9 ± 1.2). An additional 36 participants with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or early Alzheimer dementia (CDR 0.5, MMSE 25.2 ± 3.9) were added to assess diagnostic discriminability. DCTclock showed excellent discrimination between diagnostic groups (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.86). Among CN participants with biomarkers, the DCTclock summary score and spatial reasoning subscores were associated with greater amyloid and tau burden and showed better discrimination (Cohen d = 0.76) between Aβ± groups than the PACC (d = 0.30). Conclusion DCTclock discriminates between diagnostic groups and improves upon traditional cognitive tests for detecting biomarkers of amyloid and tau pathology in CN older adults. The validation of such digitized measures has the potential of providing an efficient tool for detecting early cognitive changes along the AD trajectory. Classification of evidence This study provides Class II evidence that DCTclock results were associated with amyloid and tau burden in CN older adults.

Key findings

Why it matters

In 300 participants, a digital clock-drawing test discriminated diagnostic groups well and, among clinically normal older adults, its scores were associated with greater amyloid and tau burden on PET. This suggests a simple test may help detect early Alzheimer pathology, but it is a diagnostic association study and does not show any treatment or prevention effect.

Study details

How this study scored 56/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 56 of 100.56 of 100 points earned44 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 300 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 79 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 11.3 citations a year over 7 year(s) since 2021
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 7.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 6 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 47 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Keith A. Johnson: h-index 127 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 33589537)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 56 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Rentz, D. M., Papp, K. V., Mayblyum, D. V., Sanchez, J. S., Klein, H., Souillard-Mandar, W., et al. (2021). Association of Digital Clock Drawing With PET Amyloid and Tau Pathology in Normal Older Adults. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000011697

Vancouver

Rentz DM, Papp KV, Mayblyum DV, Sanchez JS, Klein H, Souillard-Mandar W, et al. Association of Digital Clock Drawing With PET Amyloid and Tau Pathology in Normal Older Adults. Neurology. 2021. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000011697. PMID: 33589537.

BibTeX

@article{rentz2021-33589537,
  author  = {Rentz, D. M. and Papp, K. V. and Mayblyum, D. V. and Sanchez, J. S. and Klein, H. and Souillard-Mandar, W. and Sperling, R. A. and Johnson, K. A.},
  title   = {{Association of Digital Clock Drawing With PET Amyloid and Tau Pathology in Normal Older Adults}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2021},
  doi     = {10.1212/wnl.0000000000011697},
  pmid    = {33589537},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000011697}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 15.

Later studies that cite this one

6 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →