Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 60 out of 100. Disparities

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Of the 2,183 participants (mean ± SD age 79 ± 4.5 years, 58% female, 24% Black), 176 (8%) developed dementia. The median follow-up time was 3 years, and the mean Zio XT Patch wear time was 12 days. After multivariable adjustment, each 1-SD decrement in relative amplitude and 1-SD increment in intradaily variability were associated with 54% (95% CI 32%-78%) and 19% (95% CI 2%-38%) greater risk of dementia, respectively. Amplitude and mesor were associated with elevated dementia risk after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratios per 1-SD decrement: 1.43 [95% CI 1.15-1.78] and 1.33 [95% CI 1.08-1.63], respectively). A later acrophase was associated with 1.45 times (95% CI 1.01-2.07) greater risk of dementia compared with a normal acrophase. Using accelerometer data from a commonly used ambulatory ECG monitor, weaker and more fragmented circadian RARs and later peak activity time were prospectively associated with elevated dementia risk in older Black and White adults. Limitations of our study include the lack of dementia subtype data and objective sleep disorder measurements. Further research to determine whether circadian rhythm interventions can reduce dementia risk is warranted.

Key findings

Why it matters

This cohort study found that weaker and more fragmented rest-activity rhythms and later peak activity time were associated with higher dementia risk in older Black and White adults. It did not test whether changing circadian rhythms can reduce dementia risk.

Study details

How this study scored 60/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 58 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 60 of 100. Total 60 of 100.58 of the 96 points we could judge = 60 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 58 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 60 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 2,183 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 7 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Lin Y. Chen holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Johns Hopkins University: institution h-index 2,306 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 8 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41461059)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 58 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 58 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 60 out of 100.
Total 60 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Wang, W., Wanigatunga, A. A., Etzkorn, L., Rabinowitz, J. A., Palta, P., Pike, J. R., et al. (2025). Association Between Circadian Rest-Activity Rhythms and Incident Dementia in Older Adults. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000214513

Vancouver

Wang W, Wanigatunga AA, Etzkorn L, Rabinowitz JA, Palta P, Pike JR, et al. Association Between Circadian Rest-Activity Rhythms and Incident Dementia in Older Adults. Neurology. 2025. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000214513. PMID: 41461059.

BibTeX

@article{wang2025-41461059,
  author  = {Wang, Wendy and Wanigatunga, Amal Asiri and Etzkorn, Lacey and Rabinowitz, Jill A. and Palta, Priya and Pike, James Russell and Dougherty, Ryan James and Zipunnikov, Vadim and others},
  title   = {{Association Between Circadian Rest-Activity Rhythms and Incident Dementia in Older Adults}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1212/wnl.0000000000214513},
  pmid    = {41461059},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000214513}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Disparities

Also tagged “biobank”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Disparities

See all studies in Disparities →