Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers

Background White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are prevalent in dementia, but lesion volume does not capture their microstructural heterogeneity. The T1-weighted to fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T1w/T2w-FLAIR) ratio is sensitive to myelin, gliosis, and tissue water. We tested whether lesion-specific T1w/T2w-FLAIR ratio, referenced to each participant’s normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), differs by diagnosis and reflects distinct amyloid and vascular mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VD). Methods We analyzed 576 participants from the multicentre BICWALZS cohort (seven South Korean sites), spanning subjective cognitive impairment (SCI, n=71), mild cognitive impairment (n=270), AD (n=125) and VD (n=88). WMH T1w/T2w-FLAIR ratio was regressed on NAWM ratio, yielding standardized residuals as the outcome. Regression and mediation models tested diagnosis, plasma biomarkers, APOE genotype, amyloid PET and vascular risk burden, adjusting for age, sex, education and site. We conducted regression and mediation analyses after multiple imputation for missing variables. We adjusted for hierarchical models using Bonferroni correction. We tested for insensitivity to site effects by applying ComBat harmonization. Results Older age, AD, VD, and high vascular risk burden were associated with higher residualized T1w/T2w-FLAIR ratios relative to SCI. Lower plasma amyloid-beta 42 (greater amyloid burden) was associated with lower T1w/T2w-FLAIR ratios. Greater vascular burden was associated with greater T1w/T2w-FLAIR ratios, which partially mediated the VD association with T1w/T2w-FLAIR. Lower amyloid-beta 42 (greater amyloid) was associated with lower T1w/T2w-FLAIR, which partially mediated the effect between AD and T1w/T2w-FLAIR ratio. Findings were robust to harmonization. Conclusions Residualized WMH T1w/T2w-FLAIR ratio captures lesion-specific microstructural variation missed by volumetric measures, consistent with vascular-gliotic injury in VD and coexisting amyloid-linked demyelination in AD. Limitations include the cross-sectional design, no cognitively normal comparison group, and a predominantly Korean sample.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Srirambhatla, R., Campion, J., Desmidt, T., Pan, Y., Andreescu, C., Ferreira, P. C., et al. (2026). Altered T1w/T2w-FLAIR Ratio in White Matter Hyperintensities as an Indicator of Structural Integrity Loss: Association with Alzheimer’s Disease and Vascular Dementia. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.28.26359139

Vancouver

Srirambhatla R, Campion J, Desmidt T, Pan Y, Andreescu C, Ferreira PC, et al. Altered T1w/T2w-FLAIR Ratio in White Matter Hyperintensities as an Indicator of Structural Integrity Loss: Association with Alzheimer’s Disease and Vascular Dementia. medRxiv. 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.07.28.26359139.

BibTeX

@article{srirambhatla2026-b5f25332,
  author  = {Srirambhatla, R. and Campion, J. and Desmidt, T. and Pan, Y. and Andreescu, C. and Ferreira, P. C. and Povala, G. and Bellaver, B. and others},
  title   = {{Altered T1w/T2w-FLAIR Ratio in White Matter Hyperintensities as an Indicator of Structural Integrity Loss: Association with Alzheimer’s Disease and Vascular Dementia}},
  journal = {medRxiv},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.64898/2026.07.28.26359139},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.28.26359139}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 23 of the 62 points it could be judged on, which is 37 of 100. Raw total 37 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 37 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 37 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 37 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (medRxiv)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 71 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 23 / 62 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 37 out of 100.
Total 37 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “diffusion”

172 studies in the library carry the topic tag “diffusion”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 172 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →