Second, we examined volumetric associations with amyloid (amyloid positive, tau negative versus control) and tau in the presence of amyloid (amyloid positive, tau positive versus amyloid positive, tau negative) across 52 brain areas. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 306
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Females with MCI exhibited greater baseline GMV than males primarily in the thalamus, caudate, cerebellum, postcentral gyrus, and middle cingulate gyrus, with no differences at the AD stage. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 593
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Higher WMH volume was associated with older age, lower CSF amyloid-β levels, hypertension, and smoking history (all p ≤ 0.001), as well as cognitive status (MCI, p < 0.001; dementia, p = 0.008), but not with CSF tau levels. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 1,803
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Presence on T2-weighted images of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) has been previously shown to be more commonly associated with GRN mutations rather than other forms of FTD. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 336
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Brain volume analyses included 622 participants (mean age ± SD: 70.9 ± 10.2) with an average of 3.3 MRI scans over 4.7 years. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 622
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
PSMD is a new, fully automated, and robust imaging marker for SVD. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 113
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
DNS-br total score and majority of the 11 DNS-br neurocognitive subdomain scores were significantly associated with FDG-PET resilience signature, PIB ratio, cerebral gray matter and white matter volume after adjusting for multiple testing. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 283
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
In the South Korean study to prevent cognitive impairment and protect BRAIN health through lifestyle intervention in at-risk elderly people (SUPERBRAIN), we evaluated the impact of a 24-week facility-based multidomain intervention (FMI) and home-based MI (HMI) on white matter integrity. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 152
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The Clinical Core of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) has provided clinical, operational, and data management support to ADNI since its inception. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 800
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
This article reviews all papers published since the inception of the initiative and summarizes the results as of February 2011. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 400
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
64/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 64 out of 100.
·
Brain sciences
·
2022-05-05
Biomarkers were extracted from a total of 42 participants with longitudinal time points representing 164 imaging volumes. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 24
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
This study examined whether cognitive reserve (CR) alters the relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of cortical thickness and risk of progression from normal cognition to the onset of clinical symptoms associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 232
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
64/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 64 out of 100.
·
GeroScience
·
2022-05-08
Both objective and perceived social isolations were associated with future cognitive decline and increase risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 23
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
After adjusting for age, health status, and young adult general cognitive ability, plasma NfL level was only significantly associated with processing speed and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, but not with other cognitive or neuroimaging measures. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 969
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Elevated plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) is associated with dementia though underlying mechanisms remain unknown. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 179
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
60/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 60 out of 100.
·
NeuroImage
·
2020-07-05
While aggregation of neuroimaging datasets from multiple sites and scanners can yield increased statistical power, it also presents challenges due to systematic scanner effects. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 663
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Rationale and objectives Mild cognitive impairment has been regarded as a pre-Alzheimer condition, but some patients do not develop dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 54
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Neuropathology studies show that patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease typically have lesions of the entorhinal cortex (EC), hippocampus (Hip), and temporal neocortex. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 12
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
An accurate description of changes in the brain in healthy aging is needed to understand the basis of age-related changes in cognitive function. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 122
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Our findings demonstrated a significant association between plasma NFL levels and disrupted WM microstructure across the brain. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 92
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
At follow-up, stage 1 subjects showed reduced atrophy rates in medial frontal areas and precuneus compared to stage 0 subjects, whereas stage 2/3 subjects presented accelerated atrophy in medial temporal structures. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
There is considerable debate whether Alzheimer's disease (AD) originates in basal forebrain or entorhinal cortex. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
In asymptomatic individuals, brain volumes of hippocampal subfields and of the parahippocampal cortex were numerically larger in stage 1 compared to HCs, whereas the opposite was the case in individuals with SCD. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
We observed significant differences in the association between CR and white matter tract MTV in aMCI versus HC when age, gender, intracranial volume, and memory ability were held constant. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition technique that can provide detailed information about brain microstructure. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.