Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 59 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment

Plain-language summary

Objective Recent molecular, preclinical, and preliminary clinical studies suggest that the therapeutic effects of mood stabilizers may be mediated by modulating expression of potent neurotrophic and neuroprotective factors having the potential to reverse impairments of cellular resilience, reductions in brain volume, and cell death or atrophy. Our main goal was to investigate the potential clinical significance of these findings in relation to bipolar disorder. Method The longitudinal effect of lithium on brain gray matter volume was investigated in well-characterized (DSM-IV criteria) bipolar depressed subjects (N = 28) at baseline (medication-free) and after lithium administration (4 weeks). Total brain gray matter, prefrontal gray matter, and left subgenual prefrontal gray matter volumes were determined using validated semiautomated segmentation and region of interest methodology. The study was conducted from November 1997 until April 2004 at Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Mich. Results Significant increases in total brain gray matter volume in bipolar subjects were observed after 4 weeks of lithium administration (p = .0043). Moreover, regional analyses in the bipolar subjects revealed significant differences between responders (>50% decrease in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total score) and nonresponders; only responders showed a significant increase in gray matter volume in the prefrontal cortex (p = .003) and an increase at trend level in the left subgenual prefrontal cortex volume (p = .0786). Conclusion The increase in gray matter volume in these areas, which various neuroimaging and postmortem neuropathology studies have implicated in the neuropathophysiology of bipolar disorder, suggests that the observed effects may be linked to clinical response. The findings also support the notion that future treatments that more directly target molecules in critical central nervous system pathways that regulate cellular plasticity hold promise as novel, improved, long-term treatments for mood disorders as well as some neurodegenerative conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00870311.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Moore, G. J., Cortese, B. M., Glitz, D. A., Zajac-Benitez, C., Quiroz, J. A., Uhde, T. W., et al. (2009). A longitudinal study of the effects of lithium treatment on prefrontal and subgenual prefrontal gray matter volume in treatment-responsive bipolar disorder patients. The Journal of clinical psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.07m03745

Vancouver

Moore GJ, Cortese BM, Glitz DA, Zajac-Benitez C, Quiroz JA, Uhde TW, et al. A longitudinal study of the effects of lithium treatment on prefrontal and subgenual prefrontal gray matter volume in treatment-responsive bipolar disorder patients. The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 2009. doi:10.4088/jcp.07m03745. PMID: 19389332.

BibTeX

@article{moore2009-19389332,
  author  = {Moore, G. J. and Cortese, B. M. and Glitz, D. A. and Zajac-Benitez, C. and Quiroz, J. A. and Uhde, T. W. and Drevets, W. C. and Manji, H. K.},
  title   = {{A longitudinal study of the effects of lithium treatment on prefrontal and subgenual prefrontal gray matter volume in treatment-responsive bipolar disorder patients}},
  journal = {The Journal of clinical psychiatry},
  year    = {2009},
  doi     = {10.4088/jcp.07m03745},
  pmid    = {19389332},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.07m03745}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 59/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 34 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 59 of 100. Total 59 of 100.34 of the 58 points we could judge = 59 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 34 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 59 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The Journal of clinical psychiatry)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2009 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 28 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 19389332)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 34 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 34 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 59 out of 100.
Total 59 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Drug development from nearby years

Also tagged “late-life-depression”

139 studies in the library carry the topic tag “late-life-depression”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 139 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →