alzhub.org
Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Research

28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.

Find studies

Showing 151–175 of 263 studies with an author at McGill University (CA) (page 7 of 11) · 28,180 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Download bibliography of these 263 studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

Subjects

Authors

Names as each record prints them; the same person can appear under two spellings.

Other institutions

From OpenAlex; 13,658 studies have no institution on record and are not counted here.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Sex differences in clinical phenotypes of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 52 out of 100. Alzheimer s & Dementia 2025-04-01

Females with sporadic bvFTD showed worse compulsive behavior (p = 0.026) and language impairments (p = 0.024) compared to females with genetic bvFTD (n = 152). 5 key findings →

Participants: 152 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Proteogenomics in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma reveals new biological fingerprint of cerebral small vessel disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 52 out of 100. Nature Aging 2025-11-20

Cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) is a leading cause of stroke and dementia with no specific treatment, of which molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. 2 key findings →

Participants: 40,000 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Location of pathogenic variants in PSEN1 impacts progression of cognitive, clinical, and neurodegenerative measures in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 52 out of 100. Aging cell 2023-06-08

Although pathogenic variants in PSEN1 leading to autosomal-dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD) are highly penetrant, substantial interindividual variability in the rates of cognitive decline and biomarker change are observed in ADAD. 3 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Apolipoprotein E4 allele as a predictor of cholinergic deficits and treatment outcome in Alzheimer disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1995-12-01

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is critical in the modulation of cholesterol and phospholipid transport between cells of different types. 3 key findings →

Participants: 40 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Prediction of Alzheimer's disease in subjects with mild cognitive impairment from the ADNI cohort using patterns of cortical thinning

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. NeuroImage 2012-10-02

Predicting Alzheimer's disease (AD) in individuals with some symptoms of cognitive decline may have great influence on treatment choice and disease progression. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau, visinin-like protein-1, and chitinase-3-like protein 1 in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. Translational neurodegeneration 2018-09-10

Visinin-like protein-1 (VILIP-1) and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1 or YKL-40) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are newly discovered markers indicating neuronal damage and microglial activation, respectively. 4 key findings →

Participants: 121 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Why has therapy development for dementia failed in the last two decades?

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association 2015-12-19

The success rate of the pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) for dementia drugs has been abysmally low, in the last two decades. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

Serum neurofilament light is superior to glial fibrillary acidic protein to distinguish sporadic frontotemporal dementia from late-onset primary psychiatric disorders: a retrospective DIPPA-FTD study

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. BMJ Neurology Open 2025-01-01

Significantly higher serum median NfL and GFAP levels were found in sporadic bvFTD (NfL 33.3 pg/mL, IQR (19.6-49.6); GFAP 124.5 pg/mL, IQR (83.5-181.6)) compared with PPD (NfL 12.2 pg/mL, IQR (9.8-17.9); GFAP 68.9 pg/mL, IQR (50.6-95.0), both p<0.001). 4 key findings →

Participants: 275 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Gain and loss of function of ALS-related mutations of TARDBP (TDP-43) cause motor deficits in vivo

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Human molecular genetics 2009-12-03

TDP-43 has been found in inclusion bodies of multiple neurological disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

Cerebrospinal fluid synaptosomal-associated protein 25 is a key player in synaptic degeneration in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Alzheimer's research & therapy 2018-08-16

There is accumulating evidence that synaptic loss precedes neuronal loss and correlates best with impaired memory formation in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →

Participants: 52 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Alzheimer's disease and the basal forebrain cholinergic system: relations to beta-amyloid peptides, cognition, and treatment strategies

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Progress in neurobiology 2002-10-01

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of degenerative dementia and is characterized by progressive impairment in cognitive function during mid- to late-adult life. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

Diagnostic performance of MK and Flortaucipir tau PET for the biological staging of Alzheimer disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Alzheimer s & Dementia 2025-12-01

Clinical stages showed a progressively increased prevalence of Aβ-positivity and higher entorhinal tau PET pathology from cognitively normal (CN) to SOCD, MCI, and dementia in both tracers. 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 446 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Bridging the gap: A conversion framework for CDR-SB and MoCA scores in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease 2025-06-07

CDR-SB and MoCA scores showed strong inverse correlation (Spearman's ρ = -0.68; p < 0.001). 3 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 23,717 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Accuracy of blood-based neurofilament light to different genetic frontotemporal dementia from primary psychiatric disorders

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease 2025-07-02

NfL holds potential as a blood-based biomarker for symptomatic genetic FTD carriers, with moderate accuracy to distinguish PPD from mild forms including C9orf72 . 3 key findings →

Participants: 474 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Association between use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor and the risk of incident dementia: a population-based cohort study

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care 2025-01-01

Among a cohort of 118 006 individuals, the incident rate (IR) of dementia was 0.56/1000 person-years over a median follow-up period of 1.54 years among SGLT-2i users compared with 2.67/1000 person-years in DPP-4i users, over a median follow-up period of 1.79 years. 4 key findings →

Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Gray and white matter pathology progression in Parkinson's disease patients that develop mild cognitive impairment

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. Alzheimer s & Dementia 2025-12-01

All included PD patients were cognitively normal at baseline and had 6 years of follow-up assessments available for cognitive status. 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 47 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed