Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

CDR-SB and MoCA scores showed strong inverse correlation (Spearman's ρ = -0.68; p < 0.001). Crosswalk tables demonstrated good agreement across the cognitive spectrum and performed consistently in the full cohort and an AD-specific subgroup. This study provides the first validated, bidirectional CDR-SB-MoCA crosswalk, supporting data harmonization and consistent interpretation of cognitive severity across research and clinical settings.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study provides a validated bidirectional crosswalk between CDR-SB and MoCA scores, which were strongly inversely correlated. It supports harmonizing cognitive severity data across research and clinical settings, but it does not address treating, curing, or preventing dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 49/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 49 of 100.49 of 100 points earned51 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease: journal h-index 63 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 23,717 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared: h-index 20 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 McGill University: institution h-index 1,373 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40484799)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 49 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Haji, B., Zhang, Q., & Monfared, A. A. T. (2025). Bridging the gap: A conversion framework for CDR-SB and MoCA scores in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100226

Vancouver

Haji B, Zhang Q, Monfared AAT. Bridging the gap: A conversion framework for CDR-SB and MoCA scores in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100226. PMID: 40484799.

BibTeX

@article{haji2025-40484799,
  author  = {Haji, Babak and Zhang, Quanwu and Monfared, Amir Abbas Tahami},
  title   = {{Bridging the gap: A conversion framework for CDR-SB and MoCA scores in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia}},
  journal = {The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100226},
  pmid    = {40484799},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100226}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 13.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “assessment”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assessment”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →