You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.
Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline800-272-390024 hours a day, 365 days a yearFree, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline98824/7Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline866-232-84849:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a weekLicensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat.Text: 646-586-5283
In a medical emergency, call 911.
More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.
Research
30,980 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Find studies
Showing 1,826–1,850 of 1,906 studies in Treatments(page 74 of 77)· 30,980 in the whole library·How the 0–100 score works
Download bibliography of the first 500 of these studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)
From OpenAlex; 16,452 studies have no institution on record and are not counted here.
What “Treatments” covers
Treatments — Drug and non-drug treatment research — what was tested, in whom, and what changed — plus the approvals and coverage decisions that followed.
A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.
We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.
Alzheimer disease (AD) is the neurodegenerative condition that occurs in the elderly population above 65 years old and is the major cause of dementia. 5 key findings →
Alzheimer's disease is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder characterized by amyloid- β aggregation, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, tau hyperphosphorylation, and cholinergic dysfunction. 1 key finding →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 27 out of 100.·Probecell Science·2026-01-11
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder involving the amyloid-β plaque deposition, tau pathology, synaptic dysfunction, and impairment in cognition. 3 key findings →
Progressive neurodegeneration, which causes memory loss, cognitive decline, and functional impairment is known as Alzheimer's disease, the most common type of dementia, first identified by Alois Alzheimer in 1907. 1 key finding →
For persons with early-stage sympathetic Alzheimer's disease (AD), including those with mild cognitive impairment and mild congitive dementia stages of the disease with confirmed amyloid pathology, KISUNLA (donanemab-azbt) is a disease-modifying treatment. 1 key finding →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 26 out of 100.·EvidenzUpdate·2025-10-09
Nößler: Selten hat die Neuanführung eines Arzneimittels so ein großes Medienecho ausgelöst wie jüngst der Markteintritt von Lecanemab und jetzt die Zulassung von Donanemab. 5 key findings →
Lecanemab ist eine Anti-Amyloid-Antikörper-Therapie, die entwickelt wurde, um toxische Amyloid-Plaques zu beseitigen und das Fortschreiten der Alzheimer-Krankheit zu verlangsamen. 4 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 26 out of 100.·BioSCIENCE·2025-10-15
Introdução: Avanços recentes na pesquisa de biomarcadores e estruturas diagnósticas, como o sistema de classificação ATN, redefiniram a abordagem do diagnóstico e tratamento precoces. 5 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 26 out of 100.·Kranion·2025-08-22
ResumenLa enfermedad de Alzheimer (EA) es una enfermedad neurodegenerativa crónica que se caracteriza por la acumulación excesiva de proteína beta-amiloide y de proteína Tau fosforilada. 1 key finding →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 26 out of 100.·Geriatrie up2date·2025-10-01
All articles of this category (opens in new window) Die zerebrale Amyloidangiopathie (CAA) ist eine Erkrankung, bei der sich beta-Amyloid in den Gefäßwänden des Gehirns ablagert. 5 key findings →
Wissenschaftler*innen der Washington Universität in St. Louis untersuchten in dieser aktuellen Studie Machbarkeit und Sicherheit der Therapie mit dem monoklonalen Antikörper Lecanemab bei Patientinnen und Patienten mit früher symptomatischer Alzheimer-Krankheit. 4 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 25 out of 100.·Neuroradiologie Scan·2025-01-01
Eine Möglichkeit zur Behandlung von beginnenden Alzheimer-Erkrankungen stellten Anti-Amyloid-Antikörper (AK) dar, die die Amyloidablagerungen im Gehirn reduzieren sollen. 5 key findings →
Alzheimer disease is one of the causes of dementia that could make the patient lose their memories until they unable to do normal activities. 2 key findings →
Progressive neurodegenerative disorder i.e. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by cognitive decline, oxidative stress, and cholinergic dysfunction, β-amyloid aggregation, tau hyperphosphorylation. 5 key findings →
On June 7, 2021, the FDA granted accelerated approval to aducanumab (Aduhelm), the first new Alzheimer's drug approved since 2003 and the first ever approved for a mechanism thought to modify disease course. 3 key findings →
⚠ Retracted — do not rely on italzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.·The Kurume medical journal·2011-01-01
A high incidence of fractures, particularly of the hip, represents an important problem in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD), who are prone to falls and have osteoporosis. 2 key findings →
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.·medRxiv (preprint)·2026-09-11
BackgroundAnti-amyloid-{beta} (A{beta}) monoclonal antibodies are disease-modifying treatments for early Alzheimers disease but are associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). 2 key findings →
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription
label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journal tierup to 10 pts
Journal's citation recordup to 4 pts
Study designup to 12 pts
Strength of evidenceup to 5 pts
Peer-review validationup to 10 pts
How recentup to 5 pts
Sample sizeup to 4 pts
Effect reportedup to 3 pts
Studied in peopleup to 3 pts
Randomised / blindedup to 2 pts
Times citedup to 7 pts
Citations per yearup to 5 pts
Impact for its field and yearup to 6 pts
Cited by studies hereup to 6 pts
Still being citedup to 4 pts
Senior author's track recordup to 4 pts
Institution's track recordup to 3 pts
Multi-centre collaborationup to 3 pts
Indexed in PubMedup to 2 pts
Free to readup to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 30,980 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of
it. It holds 30,980 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC
(65.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.4%),
plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here,
that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,042 records (3.4% of the
library) are not peer-reviewed — 967 of those are preprints posted before any
journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card
on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a
peer-reviewed article.