Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 26 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Im Zuge der Alzheimerkrankheit lagern sich Beta-Amyloid-Plaques im Gehirn ab. Der monoklonale Antikörper Lecanemab beugt diesen Plaques vor, indem er lösliche Beta-Amyloid-Fibrillen bindet und deren Clearance fördert. Allerdings begünstigen solche Antiamyloidtherapien ARIA (amyloid-related imaging abnormalities) in der MRT, die ein regelmäßiges Monitoring notwendig machen. US-Forschende prüften nun, welche Bildgebungsbiomarker ARIA vorhersagen. Fazit Vor einer Antiamyloidtherapie bei Alzheimerkrankheit muss die zerebrovaskuläre Gesundheit beurteilt werden, so die Forschenden: Eine starke DWMH-Belastung korreliert offenbar mit einem signifikant höheren ARIA-Risiko. Sie hoffen, dass dieser Bildgebungsmarker zukünftig bei der Risikostratifizierung sowie bei Therapieentscheidungen helfen kann. Größere Studien müssen nun weitere vaskuläre Biomarker identifizieren. Perspektivisch hoffen sie so auf differenziertere Prädiktionsmodelle. Publication History Article published online: 10 April 2026 © 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Bildgebungsanomalien bei Alzheimer-Therapie mit Lecanemab. (2026). Neuroradiologie Scan. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2788-0873

Vancouver

Bildgebungsanomalien bei Alzheimer-Therapie mit Lecanemab. Neuroradiologie Scan. 2026. doi:10.1055/a-2788-0873.

BibTeX

@article{study2026-b85e6325,
  title   = {{Bildgebungsanomalien bei Alzheimer-Therapie mit Lecanemab}},
  journal = {Neuroradiologie Scan},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1055/a-2788-0873},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2788-0873}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. This record has no authors, so the citation leaves them out. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Lecanemab binds soluble beta-amyloid fibrils and promotes their clearance, but anti-amyloid therapies can cause ARIA on MRI, making regular monitoring necessary. A strong DWMH burden appears to correlate with a significantly higher ARIA risk, and larger studies are needed to identify further vascular biomarkers.

Study details

How this study scored 26/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 24 of the 93 points it could be judged on, which is 26 of 100. Total 26 of 100.24 of the 93 points we could judge = 26 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 24 of the 93 points we could judge it on, which is 26 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neuroradiologie Scan)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Neuroradiologie Scan: journal h-index 4 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 24 / 93 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 24 of the 93 points we could judge it on is 26 out of 100.
Total 26 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “placebo-controlled”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “placebo-controlled”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →