Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 25 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Alzheimer disease is one of the causes of dementia that could make the patient lose their memories until they unable to do normal activities. It is caused by accumulation of protein in the brain called Amyloid-β42 (Aβ42), that often used as biomarker for alzheimer by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). To increase the sensitivity and accuracy, capture antibodies are conjugated with labels such as Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) and Biotin. However, the two conjugates also differ in sensitivity and specificity, therefore this research is to find which is more optimum and stable for ELISA usage. The molecular mass of the conjugated antibodies was characterized with SDS-PAGE, result shows the pre-conjugated antibody has 150 kDa bands, conjugated antibody with labels is heavier than the pre-conjugated due to the addition of each label. Conjugated antibody tested with tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), then analyzed by ELISA reader. The measurement precision decided with %CV value with results shows dillution from 10-1 to 10-4 has %CV less than 10%, while Biotin is from 10-1 to 10-5. Optimization done by determining fixed antigen with the conjugated antibody, the optimal concentration for HRP is 10-3 while biotin is at 10-4. Stability of the conjugated antibody was also determined, HRP measurement started to unstable around second month and third month, while biotin start to unstable around fourth month, this shows the biotin is more stable than the HRP.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Fiero, N. R., Saepuloh, U., Darusman, H. S., & Noviana, R. (2025). Development of Biotin and Horseradish Peroxidase Labelling against Monoclonal Antibody Amyloid-β42 and Its Application on Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i10.12528

Vancouver

Fiero NR, Saepuloh U, Darusman HS, Noviana R. Development of Biotin and Horseradish Peroxidase Labelling against Monoclonal Antibody Amyloid-β42 and Its Application on Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 2025. doi:10.29303/jppipa.v11i10.12528.

BibTeX

@article{fiero2025-65f4fa6e,
  author  = {Fiero, Nur Rizky and Saepuloh, Uus and Darusman, Huda Shalahudin and Noviana, Rachmitasari},
  title   = {{Development of Biotin and Horseradish Peroxidase Labelling against Monoclonal Antibody Amyloid-β42 and Its Application on Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay}},
  journal = {Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.29303/jppipa.v11i10.12528},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i10.12528}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This laboratory work compared two antibody labelling methods, horseradish peroxidase and biotin, for use in an ELISA test that measures the Alzheimer's-related protein Amyloid-β42. It is a technical methods study about test reagents and does not test any treatment, prevention or cure in patients.

Study details

How this study scored 25/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 0 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 25 of 100.25 of 100 points earned75 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA: journal h-index 35 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 0 / 4 Last-listed author Rachmitasari Noviana: h-index 3 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 IPB University: institution h-index 181 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 25 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “precursor”

1,339 studies in the library carry the topic tag “precursor”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,339 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →