31,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Selective survival of men with a healthier cardiovascular risk profile and hence lower propensity to dementia might partly explain the higher LTR of dementia/AD in women. 1 key finding →
Participants: 7,901 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Risk factors for progression from MCI to probable AD differed in men and women. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 294 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Chronic obesity is associated with several complications, including cognitive impairment and dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Individual cardiometabolic disorders and genetic factors are associated with an increased dementia risk; however, the relationship between dementia and cardiometabolic multimorbidity is unclear. 4 key findings →
Participants: 236 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ), a measure of average blood glucose level, is associated with the risk of dementia and cognitive impairment. 4 key findings →
Participants: 13,000 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We aimed to evaluate the link between severe hypoglycaemia and domain-specific cognitive decline, smaller brain volumes and dementia in adults with type 2 diabetes, which so far has been relatively poorly characterised. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 580 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Poor social health is likely associated with cognitive decline and risk of dementia; however, studies show inconsistent results. 4 key findings →
Participants: 4,514 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
From 2000 to 2002, we assessed parental history of dementia in participants without dementia of the Rotterdam Study. 4 key findings →
Participants: 2,087 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A high adherence to the Mediterranean-Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Diet Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) has been associated with better cognition and a lower risk of dementia in some but not all studies. 4 key findings →
Participants: 120,661 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of the 2,183 participants (mean ± SD age 79 ± 4.5 years, 58% female, 24% Black), 176 (8%) developed dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,183 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
During a median follow-up of 7.98 years, 896 incident dementia cases were identified among study participants. 5 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 31,587 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Median follow-up was 7.5 years (interquartile range: 7.0 to 9.0 years), during this time 387 participants (0.8 %) were diagnosed with dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 47,371 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study included 10 333 FHS 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 886 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our sample included 11,105 patients (median age 77, 51% female), with 2299 in the hallway group and 8806 in the non-hallway group. 5 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort Participants: 11,105 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
After propensity score matching, each group consisted of 15901 patients. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 15,901 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Higher midlife fitness levels seem to be associated with lower hazards of developing all-cause dementia later in life. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Midlife CVRFs, especially hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and smoking, are common and associated with accelerated cognitive decline at midlife. 5 key findings →
Participants: 143 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The rate of cognitive change in elderly persons with and without diabetes mellitus is similar, although cognitive performance is poorer in persons with diabetes mellitus. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,493 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Overall dementia prevalence was 4.8%. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Surprisingly, fallers and non-fallers did not differ on any conventional assessment (p = 0.069-0.991), except for 'previous faller' (p = 0.006). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 77 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Linear MR suggested that each additional hour/day of sleep was associated with 1% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0-2%; P = 0.008] slower reaction time and 3% more errors in visual-memory test (95% CI = 0-6%; P = 0.05). 4 key findings →
Participants: 395 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
From 2011 to 2013, 1,744 participants completed high-resolution vessel wall MRI from the population-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study by a sampling strategy that allowed weighting back to the cohort. 4 key findings →
Participants: 291 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
During follow-up, 60 individuals developed dementia, of which 49 had Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,322 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Identifying brain regions associated with risk factors for dementia could guide mechanistic understanding of risk factors associated with Alzheimer disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 8,312 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The positive association of choline for cognition has been reported in both animal and human studies, yet the associations of choline with the risks of incident dementia or Alzheimer's disease (AD) in humans is unclear. 4 key findings →
Participants: 3,224 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.2%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,048 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events