27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The national combined PAF for 11 modifiable risk factors was 39.6 % (95 % CI: 20.8-55.9). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 86,494 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 934,792 individuals, 81,731 developed dementia over a mean follow-up of 11·6 years. 1 key finding →
Participants: 934,792 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
There was a significant difference in dementia incidence in the HSV-infected group versus the control. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Over the last decade, age-standardised dementia incidence estimated rates have decreased by 52.8 % for women and 53.1 % for males. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We identified 132,968 individuals, of whom 12,088 with severe Zoster, 60,440 matched controls among the general population, and 60,440 matched controls among the hospitalised population. 5 key findings →
Participants: 132,968 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Over a median follow-up of 8.2 years, YOD incidence increased progressively with higher WC. 5 key findings →
Participants: 964,536 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We found positive associations between the 15 PM 2.5 components and the incidence of dementia and AD. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among the 18,013 participants with complete data for analysis, 516 (2.86%) exhibited cognitive impairment. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 27,768 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We recruited 1501 participants (304 with FTLD, 512 with AD, and 685 healthy controls) from the Multi-Partner Consortium to Expand Dementia Research in Latin America (ReDLat). 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,501 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with poorer cognitive performance and increased dementia risk. 2 key findings →
Participants: 9,943 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a significant and increasingly recognized problem in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). 2 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 100 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Elevated FSH and reduced LH may be associated with poorer cognition and an increased risk of AD-D in very old Chinese adults, particularly in males. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 509 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
General and central obesity trajectories beyond midlife with persistently high or increasing patterns were significantly associated with an increased risk of developing cognitive decline and dementia in late life. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Brain deposition of transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) is a feature of neurodegenerative syndromes. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,058 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The combinations that were both highly prevalent and had the most detrimental effect on global cognition were: hearing loss and physical inactivity for the dyad (mean difference in change score = -0.07 SD; 95 % CI: -0.09 to -0.06; p < 0.001; effect size = -0.28), hearing loss, physical inactivity, and hypertension for the triad (mean difference in change score = -0.07; 95 % CI: -0.09 to -0.06; p < 0.001; effect size = -0.28), and hearing loss, physical inactivity, hypertension, and sleep disturbance for the tetrad (mean difference in change score = -0.05; 95 % CI: -0.07 to -0.03; p < 0.001; effect size = -0.20). 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 30,097 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
To investigate the response to an invitation to participate in a blended mobile Health intervention among adults living in deprived areas. 2 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The Cardiovascular Health Study is a population-based, longitudinal study designed to evaluate factors related to the onset, course, and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in adults aged 65 years and older. 4 key findings →
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Dietary intake of n-3 fatty acids and weekly consumption of fish may reduce the risk of incident Alzheimer disease.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
A rise in the incidence of bullous pemphigoid (BP) was documented recently in Europe, and the main risk factors for BP remain unknown. 2 key findings →
Design: case-control study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
ApoE on high-density lipoproteins is primarily responsible for lipid transport and cholesterol homeostasis in the central nervous system (CNS). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The results of this study suggest that hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia caused by insulin resistance accelerate NP formation in combination with the effects of APOE epsilon4. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In generalized estimating equation models (adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, and years of education), higher cholesterol (total cholesterol and LDL-C) concentrations and history of diabetes were associated with faster cognitive decline. 3 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Insulin resistance (IR) is the main pathological condition underlying vascular disorders, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, which are well established risk factors for cognitive decline and Alzheimer disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the oldest old, the presence of the APOE epsilon2 allele (APOE2) was associated with a somewhat reduced risk of dementia, but paradoxically was associated with increased Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathology. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Use of vitamin E and vitamin C supplements in combination is associated with reduced prevalence and incidence of AD. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
10 of the 3,247 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →