28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Increasing neighborhood disadvantage was associated with increased risk of EHR-documented dementia diagnosis or dementia-related death (most vs. least disadvantaged ADI quintile HR = 1.76, 95% confidence interval = 1.69-1.84) after adjusting for age and sex. 4 key findings →
Participants: 253,421 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Participants with more FTUs were found to have a slower biological ageing process. 5 key findings →
Participants: 22,900 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Vaccination is increasingly acknowledged as an effective preventive measure not only against specific infections, but also for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in high-risk patients. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
There was a significantly higher risk of developing a dementia diagnosis in Hispanic/Latino and NHB participants than NHW participants and comparably increased dementia hazard ratios in the Hispanic/Latino, NHB, and NHW APOE4 carriers than non-carriers (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] 1.54 [1.25-1.91], 1.25 [1.00-1.57], and 1.55 [1.40-1.72]). 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 9,784 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 24 762 people with HIV and 494 963 people without HIV (86.9% men, 45.5% White, 23.1% Black, 20.3% Hispanic), incident dementia diagnoses declined from 2000 to 2023 in both people with and without HIV (-7.68 and -2.70% per period, respectively). 5 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort Participants: 762 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
After 3.5 years of follow up, 19 new cases of dementia were identified among 229 surviving participants. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 341 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 2,218 participants, 237 (11%) developed dementia in the period 1992/3 to 2015/6. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,218 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The incidence of dementia was 0.68 (95% CI 0.64-0.72) cases per 100 person-years in pSS, and it was 0.58 (0.56-0.60) in the controls. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 20,160 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Between Sept 1, 2017, and Feb 28, 2019, 19 403 individuals were invited to participate and 9745 participants (1525 with dementia, 8220 without dementia) were included. 4445 (45·6%) of 9745 participants were male and 5300 (54·4%) were female. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 403 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 8994 and 14 720 participants were involved in the change-to-change analyses and change-to-dementia analyses, respectively. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 720 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Among 1,528,885 adults with type 2 diabetes (mean age, 58 years; 49.2% women), GLP-1 receptor agonists plus metformin were associated with lower incidence of vascular dementia (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.57), mild cognitive disorder (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95), and Alzheimer disease (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31-0.70). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,528,885 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
There were 656 deaths, 1585 incidents of CVD and 165 dementia diagnoses during 17.2 years of follow-up. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 9,584 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Across several cohorts, delirium is emerging as an important prognostic signal, independent of chronic markers of baseline morbidity, that identifies patients at markedly increased risk of death or future dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,556 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In this multi-cohort study of older adults without cognitive impairment, we show that WMH and lacunes independently predict increased risk of MCR, after adjusting for key confounders. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,772 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Our study suggests that being a caregiver who is experiencing mental or emotional strain is an independent risk factor for mortality among elderly spousal caregivers.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
White matter findings were significantly associated with age, silent stroke, hypertension, FEV1, and income.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Stronger adherence to the Mediterranean diet may reduce the rate of cognitive decline among black, but not white older adults. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study found no evidence that major lifestyle factors, aside from smoking, or sleep duration influence the risk of dementia. 4 key findings →
Participants: 3,755 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The aim of this prospective cohort study was to identify the risk factors involved in falls in 190 elderly residents of two geriatric centres in Granada (Andalusia, Spain). 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
It is recommended that the IOH definition be applied when taking continuous noninvasive orthostatic BP measurements in older people. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 112 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Uncontrolled diabetes increases the risk of Alzheimer's disease and VaD. 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,248 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Older adults with dementia who take atypical antipsychotics have a similar risk of ischaemic stroke to those taking typical antipsychotics. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
However, whether large perivascular spaces (L-PVSs) (>3 mm in diameter) visible on MRI are associated with SVD and cognitive deterioration in older individuals is unknown. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,612 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The small effect of VRFs and LAD on WMH suggests that WMH have a large "nonvascular," nonatheromatous etiology. 3 key findings →
Participants: 881 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
There are specific risk factors associated with feeding tube placement in nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
10 of the 3,281 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →