Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The progressive nature of dementia necessitates early detection strategies capable of identifying preclinical cognitive decline. Gait disturbances, mediated by higher-order cognitive functions, have emerged as potential digital biomarkers in this context. This bibliometric review systematically maps the scientific output from 2010 to 2025 on the application of wearable sensor technologies and gait analysis in the early diagnosis of dementia. A targeted search of the Scopus database yielded 126 peer-reviewed studies, which were analyzed using VOSviewer for performance metrics, co-authorship networks, bibliographic coupling, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence. The findings delineate a multidisciplinary research landscape, with major contributions spanning neurology, geriatrics, biomedical engineering, and computational sciences. Four principal thematic clusters were identified: (1) Cognitive and Clinical Aspects of Dementia, (2) Physical Activity and Mobility in Older Adults, (3) Technological and Analytical Approaches to Gait and Frailty and (4) Aging, Cognitive Decline, and Emerging Technologies. Despite the proliferation of research, significant gaps persist in longitudinal validation, methodological standardization, and integration into clinical workflows. This review emphasizes the potential of sensor-derived gait metrics to augment early diagnostic protocols and advocates for interdisciplinary collaboration to advance scalable, non-invasive diagnostic solutions for neurodegenerative diseases.

Key findings

Why it matters

This bibliometric review maps research on wearable sensors and gait analysis for early dementia detection and finds the field is still growing. It reports major gaps in long-term validation, standardized methods, and use in clinical workflows, so gait sensors are not yet an established way to prevent or treat dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 50/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 50 of 100.50 of 100 points earned50 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Sensors)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Sensors: journal h-index 338 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 6 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 13.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 6 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Pinelopi Vlotinou: h-index 12 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Aristotle University of Thessaloniki: institution h-index 560 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41471663)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 50 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Tsiakiri, A., Plakias, S., Giarmatzis, G., Tsakni, G. J., Christidi, F., Karakitsiou, G., et al. (2025). Wearable Sensor Technologies and Gait Analysis for Early Detection of Dementia: Trends and Future Directions. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25247669

Vancouver

Tsiakiri A, Plakias S, Giarmatzis G, Tsakni GJ, Christidi F, Karakitsiou G, et al. Wearable Sensor Technologies and Gait Analysis for Early Detection of Dementia: Trends and Future Directions. Sensors. 2025. doi:10.3390/s25247669. PMID: 41471663.

BibTeX

@article{tsiakiri2025-41471663,
  author  = {Tsiakiri, Anna and Plakias, Spyridon and Giarmatzis, Georgios and Tsakni, Georgia J. and Christidi, Foteini and Karakitsiou, Georgia and Georgousopoulou, Vasiliki and Manomenidis, Georgios and others},
  title   = {{Wearable Sensor Technologies and Gait Analysis for Early Detection of Dementia: Trends and Future Directions}},
  journal = {Sensors},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3390/s25247669},
  pmid    = {41471663},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3390/s25247669}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →