Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 56 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

This study presents a probabilistic framework that combines image registration, tissue classification, and bias correction into a single generative model. The model is based on a mixture of Gaussians extended to incorporate smooth intensity variation and nonlinear registration with tissue probability maps. It provides a derivation of a log-likelihood objective function and describes a strategy, including requisite partial derivatives, for optimising the model parameters.

Key findings

Why it matters

This paper describes a single statistical model that combines aligning brain scans, sorting tissue types and correcting image intensity. It is an image-analysis method used to measure the brain in imaging research, not a study of a treatment for Alzheimer's.

How this study scored 56/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence left out, no data; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 7 of 7; Citations per year 5 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 4 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 53 of the 95 points it could be judged on, which is 56 of 100. Total 56 of 100.53 of the 95 points we could judge = 56 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on strength of evidence, so that was left out: it earned 53 of the 95 points we could judge it on, which is 56 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (NeuroImage)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 NeuroImage: journal h-index 523 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence — / 5 No evidence rating recorded — left out of this score
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2005 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 7 / 7 Cited 7,435 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 5 / 5 323.3 citations a year over 23 year(s) since 2005
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 80.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 4 / 4 Cited 1,166 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Karl John Friston: h-index 261 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University College London: institution h-index 2,029 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 15955494)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 53 / 95 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 53 of the 95 points we could judge it on is 56 out of 100.
Total 56 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2005). Unified segmentation. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018

Vancouver

Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. NeuroImage. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018. PMID: 15955494.

BibTeX

@article{ashburner2005-15955494,
  author  = {Ashburner, John and Friston, Karl John},
  title   = {{Unified segmentation}},
  journal = {NeuroImage},
  year    = {2005},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018},
  pmid    = {15955494},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018}
}

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →