Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 56 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Plain-language summary

We detected and mapped a dynamically spreading wave of gray matter loss in the brains of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The loss pattern was visualized in four dimensions as it spread over time from temporal and limbic cortices into frontal and occipital brain regions, sparing sensorimotor cortices. The shifting deficits were asymmetric (left hemisphere > right hemisphere) and correlated with progressively declining cognitive status (p < 0.0006). Novel brain mapping methods allowed us to visualize dynamic patterns of atrophy in 52 high-resolution magnetic resonance image scans of 12 patients with AD (age 68.4 +/- 1.9 years) and 14 elderly matched controls (age 71.4 +/- 0.9 years) scanned longitudinally (two scans; interscan interval 2.1 +/- 0.4 years). A cortical pattern matching technique encoded changes in brain shape and tissue distribution across subjects and time. Cortical atrophy occurred in a well defined sequence as the disease progressed, mirroring the sequence of neurofibrillary tangle accumulation observed in cross sections at autopsy. Advancing deficits were visualized as dynamic maps that change over time. Frontal regions, spared early in the disease, showed pervasive deficits later (>15% loss). The maps distinguished different phases of AD and differentiated AD from normal aging. Local gray matter loss rates (5.3 +/- 2.3% per year in AD v 0.9 +/- 0.9% per year in controls) were faster in the left hemisphere (p < 0.029) than the right. Transient barriers to disease progression appeared at limbic/frontal boundaries. This degenerative sequence, observed in vivo as it developed, provides the first quantitative, dynamic visualization of cortical atrophic rates in normal elderly populations and in those with dementia.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: Not rated

Repeat MRI scans of 12 people with Alzheimer's and 14 matched controls showed a wave of gray matter loss spreading from temporal and limbic areas into frontal and occipital areas, alongside declining thinking. Gray matter was lost at 5.3% per year in Alzheimer's versus 0.9% per year in controls.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Thompson, P. M., Hayashi, K. M., de Zubicaray, G. I., Janke, A. L., Rose, S., Semple, J. M., et al. (2003). Dynamics of Gray Matter Loss in Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.23-03-00994.2003

Vancouver

Thompson PM, Hayashi KM, de Zubicaray GI, Janke AL, Rose S, Semple JM, et al. Dynamics of Gray Matter Loss in Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Neuroscience. 2003. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-03-00994.2003. PMID: 12574429.

BibTeX

@article{thompson2003-12574429,
  author  = {Thompson, Paul M. and Hayashi, Kiralee M. and de Zubicaray, Greig Ian and Janke, Andrew L. and Rose, Stephen and Semple, James M. and Herman, David H. and Hong, Michael and Dittmer, Stephanie S. and Doddrell, David M. and Toga, Arthur W.},
  title   = {{Dynamics of Gray Matter Loss in Alzheimer's Disease}},
  journal = {Journal of Neuroscience},
  year    = {2003},
  doi     = {10.1523/jneurosci.23-03-00994.2003},
  pmid    = {12574429},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.23-03-00994.2003}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 11 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Why it matters

Repeat MRI scans of 12 people with Alzheimer's and 14 matched controls showed a wave of gray matter loss spreading from temporal and limbic areas into frontal and occipital areas, alongside declining thinking. Gray matter was lost at 5.3% per year in Alzheimer's versus 0.9% per year in controls.

How this study scored 56/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence left out, no data; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 7 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 53 of the 95 points it could be judged on, which is 56 of 100. Total 56 of 100.53 of the 95 points we could judge = 56 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on strength of evidence, so that was left out: it earned 53 of the 95 points we could judge it on, which is 56 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Neuroscience)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Journal of Neuroscience: journal h-index 651 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence — / 5 No evidence rating recorded — left out of this score
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2003 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 7 / 7 Cited 1,139 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 45.6 citations a year over 25 year(s) since 2003
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 25.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 98 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Arthur W. Toga: h-index 179 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of California, Los Angeles: institution h-index 1,923 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 12574429)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 53 / 95 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 53 of the 95 points we could judge it on is 56 out of 100.
Total 56 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging from nearby years

Also in Brain scans and imaging

149 studies in the library are filed under Brain scans and imaging with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Brain scans and imaging hub.

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →