Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 34 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

The accuracy of α-synuclein-SAA for DLB was 87% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77% to 98%) in CSF, 85% (95% CI: 75% to 98%) in skin, 58% (95% CI: 47% to 69%) in olfactory mucosa, and 59% (95% CI: 51% to 66%) in urine. The core symptoms - fluctuations, REM sleep behavior disorder, and parkinsonism - had accuracies for SAA positivity of ≥79%. Notably, 95% of SAA-positive patients also had hyposmia. These findings support the use of CSF and skin α-synuclein-SAAs as diagnostic tools for DLB, with strong associations between SAA and clinical phenotype. In particular, intact olfactory function is associated with a lower risk of SAA positivity. Highlights: CSF and skin biopsies show high diagnostic accuracy for α-synuclein, demonstrating good concordance.Strong correlations exist between core symptoms of DLB and pathological α-synuclein.A very high sensitivity of hyposmia for pathological α-synuclein is observed.A novel proof-of-concept is offered for the potential detection of pathological α-synuclein in urine, marking the first such comparative analysis between patients with DLB and AD.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

McWilliam, O. H., Bsoul, R., Lund, E. L., Waldemar, G., Hasselbalch, S. G., Simonsen, A. H., et al. (2025). α‐Synuclein seed amplification assay in Lewy body dementia versus Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70203

Vancouver

McWilliam OH, Bsoul R, Lund EL, Waldemar G, Hasselbalch SG, Simonsen AH, et al. α‐Synuclein seed amplification assay in Lewy body dementia versus Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring. 2025. doi:10.1002/dad2.70203. PMID: 41211301.

BibTeX

@article{mcwilliam2025-41211301,
  author  = {McWilliam, Oskar Hoffmann and Bsoul, Remarh and Lund, Eva Løbner and Waldemar, Gunhild and Hasselbalch, Steen Gregers and Simonsen, Anja Hviid and Bruun, Marie and von Buchwald, Christian and others},
  title   = {{α‐Synuclein seed amplification assay in Lewy body dementia versus Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia Diagnosis Assessment \& Disease Monitoring},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/dad2.70203},
  pmid    = {41211301},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70203}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

The α-synuclein seed amplification assay showed high accuracy in cerebrospinal fluid and skin for diagnosing dementia with Lewy bodies. This is a diagnostic tool and does not treat, cure, or prevent Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 34/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 34 of 100.34 of 100 points earned66 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring: journal h-index 86 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Kristian Steen Frederiksen: h-index 37 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Copenhagen: institution h-index 1,378 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41211301)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 34 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “precursor”

1,339 studies in the library carry the topic tag “precursor”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,339 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →