Home › Research › Treatments
Tramiprosate in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease - a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre study (the Alphase Study)
Aisen PS, Gauthier S, Ferris SH, Saumier D, Haine D, Garceau D, Duong A, Suhy J et al.. Archives of medical science : AMS, 2011-02-01
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
Introduction The aim of the study was to assess the clinical efficacy, safety, and disease-modification effects of tramiprosate (homotaurine, ALZHEMED(TM)) in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). Material and methods Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial in 67 clinical centres across North America. Patients aged ≥ 50 years, with mild-to-moderate AD (Mini-Mental State Examination score between 16 and 26) and on stable doses of cholinesterase inhibitors, alone or with memantine. Intervention 78-week treatment with placebo, tramiprosate 100 mg or tramiprosate 150 mg BID. Measurements Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale - cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) assessments were performed at baseline and every 13 weeks. Baseline and 78-week magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) hippocampus volume (HV) measurements were conducted in a subgroup of patients. Results A total of 1,052 patients were enrolled and 790 (75.1%) completed the 78-week trial. Patient discontinuation and reasons for withdrawal were similar across groups. Planned analyses did not reveal statistically significant between-group differences. Lack of adequate statistical validity of the planned analysis models led to the development of revised predictive models. These adjusted models showed a trend toward a treatment effect for ADAS-cog (P = 0.098) and indicated significantly less HV loss for tramiprosate 100 mg (P = 0.035) and 150 mg (P = 0.009) compared to placebo. The incidence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups. Conclusions The primary planned analyses did not show a significant treatment effect, but were confounded by unexplained variance. Post-hoc analyses showed a significant treatment-related reduction in HV loss. However, there was only a trend towards slowing of decline on the ADAS-cog and no slowing of decline on the CDR-SB. These results must be interpreted in consideration of the limitations of clinical and disease-modification outcome measures and their relationship, the heterogeneity of the disease and the impact of confounding demographic and clinical variables.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Aisen, P. S., Gauthier, S., Ferris, S. H., Saumier, D., Haine, D., Garceau, D., et al. (2011). Tramiprosate in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease - a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre study (the Alphase Study). Archives of medical science : AMS. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.20612
Vancouver
Aisen PS, Gauthier S, Ferris SH, Saumier D, Haine D, Garceau D, et al. Tramiprosate in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease - a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre study (the Alphase Study). Archives of medical science : AMS. 2011. doi:10.5114/aoms.2011.20612. PMID: 22291741.
BibTeX
@article{aisen2011-22291741,
author = {Aisen, P. S. and Gauthier, S. and Ferris, S. H. and Saumier, D. and Haine, D. and Garceau, D. and Duong, A. and Suhy, J. and others},
title = {{Tramiprosate in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease - a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre study (the Alphase Study)}},
journal = {Archives of medical science : AMS},
year = {2011},
doi = {10.5114/aoms.2011.20612},
pmid = {22291741},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.20612}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results A total of 1,052 patients were enrolled and 790 (75.1%) completed the 78-week trial.
- Planned analyses did not reveal statistically significant between-group differences.
- These adjusted models showed a trend toward a treatment effect for ADAS-cog (P = 0.098) and indicated significantly less HV loss for tramiprosate 100 mg (P = 0.035) and 150 mg (P = 0.009) compared to placebo.
- Conclusions The primary planned analyses did not show a significant treatment effect, but were confounded by unexplained variance.
- Post-hoc analyses showed a significant treatment-related reduction in HV loss.
Why it matters
In this 78-week trial, the planned analyses found no statistically significant differences between tramiprosate and placebo. Only after using adjusted models was a trend toward a treatment effect on cognition seen, and less hippocampus volume loss was found for both tramiprosate doses compared to placebo.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Study designrandomized controlled trial
- Participants1,052
- Effect size75.1%
- Evidence strengthHigh
How this study scored 74/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Archives of medical science : AMS) |
| Journal's citation record | 1 / 4 | Archives of Medical Science: journal h-index 77 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 11 / 12 | A randomised controlled trial |
| Strength of evidence | 5 / 5 | Rated “high” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2011 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 3 / 4 | 1,052 participants |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 2 / 2 | Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record) |
| Times cited | 5 / 7 | Cited 295 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 3 / 5 | 17.4 citations a year over 17 year(s) since 2011 |
| Impact for its field and year | 4 / 6 | Cited 12.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 3 / 6 | Cited by 12 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 3 / 4 | Cited 58 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 3 / 4 | Last-listed author John S. Sampalis: h-index 53 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 2 / 3 | University of California San Diego: institution h-index 1,852 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 7 institution(s) in 2 countries |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 22291741) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 74 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2011.20612
- PubMed: 22291741
- Original source →
- Free full text: Archives of Medical Science →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
13 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.
Related studies in Treatments
Also tagged “placebo-controlled”
783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “placebo-controlled”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.