Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 58 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Introduction Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a major threat for the well-being of an increasingly aged world population. The physiopathological mechanisms of late-onset AD are multiple, possibly heterogeneous, and not well understood. Different combinations of variables from several domains (i.e., clinical, neuropsychological, structural, and biochemical markers) may predict dementia conversion, according to distinct physiopathological pathways, in different groups of subjects. Methods We launched the Vallecas Project (VP), a cohort study of non-demented people aged 70-85, to characterize the social, clinical, neuropsychological, structural, and biochemical underpinnings of AD inception. Given the exploratory nature of the VP, multidimensional and machine learning techniques will be applied, in addition to the traditional multivariate statistical methods. Results A total of 1169 subjects were recruited between October 2011 and December 2013. Mean age was 74.4 years (SD 3.9), 63.5% of the subjects were women, and 17.9% of the subjects were carriers of at least one ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene. Cognitive diagnoses at inclusion were as follows: normal cognition 93.0% and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) 7.0% (3.1% amnestic MCI, 0.1% non-amnestic MCI, 3.8% mixed MCI). Blood samples were obtained and stored for future determinations in 99.9% of the subjects and 3T magnetic resonance imaging study was conducted in 89.9% of the volunteers. The cohort is being followed up annually for 4 years after the baseline. Conclusion We have established a valuable homogeneous single-center cohort which, by identifying groups of variables associated with high risk of MCI or dementia conversion, should help to clarify the early physiopathological mechanisms of AD and should provide avenues for prompt diagnosis and AD prevention.

Key findings

Why it matters

The Vallecas Project recruited 1,169 non-demented people aged 70 to 85 to characterize the social, clinical, neuropsychological, structural, and biochemical underpinnings of Alzheimer's disease inception. The authors state that by identifying groups of variables associated with high risk of MCI or dementia conversion, the cohort should help clarify early physiopathological mechanisms and provide avenues for prompt diagnosis and prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 58/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 58 of 100.58 of 100 points earned42 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Frontiers in aging neuroscience)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience: journal h-index 174 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2015 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,169 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 46 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.5 citations a year over 13 year(s) since 2015
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 4 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 13 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Pablo Martínez‐Martín: h-index 87 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Instituto de Salud Carlos III: institution h-index 649 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 7 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 26483681)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 58 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Olazarán, J., Valentí, M., Frades, B., Zea-Sevilla, M. A., Ávila-Villanueva, M., MÁ, F.-B., et al. (2015). The Vallecas Project: A Cohort to Identify Early Markers and Mechanisms of Alzheimer's Disease. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00181

Vancouver

Olazarán J, Valentí M, Frades B, Zea-Sevilla MA, Ávila-Villanueva M, MÁ F.-B, et al. The Vallecas Project: A Cohort to Identify Early Markers and Mechanisms of Alzheimer's Disease. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2015. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2015.00181. PMID: 26483681.

BibTeX

@article{olazaran2015-26483681,
  author  = {Olazarán, J. and Valentí, M. and Frades, B. and Zea-Sevilla, M. A. and Ávila-Villanueva, M. and MÁ, Fernández-Blázquez and Calero, M. and Dobato, J. L. and others},
  title   = {{The Vallecas Project: A Cohort to Identify Early Markers and Mechanisms of Alzheimer's Disease}},
  journal = {Frontiers in aging neuroscience},
  year    = {2015},
  doi     = {10.3389/fnagi.2015.00181},
  pmid    = {26483681},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00181}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 31.

Later studies that cite this one

4 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →