Home › Research › Brain scans and imaging
The Toll-->NFkappaB signaling pathway mediates the neuropathological effects of the human Alzheimer's Abeta42 polypeptide in Drosophila
Tan L, Schedl P, Song HJ, Garza D, Konsolaki M.. PloS one, 2008-12-17
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Alzheimer's (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that afflicts a significant fraction of older individuals. Although a proteolytic product of the Amyloid precursor protein, the Alphabeta42 polypeptide, has been directly implicated in the disease, the genes and biological pathways that are deployed during the process of Alphabeta42 induced neurodegeneration are not well understood and remain controversial. To identify genes and pathways that mediated Alphabeta42 induced neurodegeneration we took advantage of a Drosophila model for AD disease in which ectopically expressed human Alphabeta42 polypeptide induces cell death and tissue degeneration in the compound eye. One of the genes identified in our genetic screen is Toll (Tl). It encodes the receptor for the highly conserved Tl-->NFkB innate immunity/inflammatory pathway and is a fly homolog of the mammalian Interleukin-1 (Ilk-1) receptor. We found that Tl loss-of-function mutations dominantly suppress the neuropathological effects of the Alphabeta42 polypeptide while gain-of-function mutations that increase receptor activity dominantly enhance them. Furthermore, we present evidence demonstrating that Tl and key downstream components of the innate immunity/inflammatory pathway play a central role in mediating the neuropathological activities of Alphabeta42. We show that the deleterious effects of Alphabeta42 can be suppressed by genetic manipulations of the Tl-->NFkB pathway that downregulate signal transduction. Conversely, manipulations that upregulate signal transduction exacerbate the deleterious effects of Abeta42. Since postmortem studies have shown that the Ilk-1-->NFkB innate immunity pathway is substantially upregulated in the brains of AD patients, the demonstration that the Tl-->NFkB signaling actively promotes the process of Alphabeta42 induced cell death and tissue degeneration in flies points to possible therapeutic targets and strategies.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Tan, L., Schedl, P., Song, H. J., Garza, D., & Konsolaki, M. (2008). The Toll-->NFkappaB signaling pathway mediates the neuropathological effects of the human Alzheimer's Abeta42 polypeptide in Drosophila. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003966
Vancouver
Tan L, Schedl P, Song HJ, Garza D, Konsolaki M. The Toll-->NFkappaB signaling pathway mediates the neuropathological effects of the human Alzheimer's Abeta42 polypeptide in Drosophila. PloS one. 2008. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003966. PMID: 19088848.
BibTeX
@article{tan2008-19088848,
author = {Tan, L. and Schedl, P. and Song, H. J. and Garza, D. and Konsolaki, M.},
title = {{The Toll-->NFkappaB signaling pathway mediates the neuropathological effects of the human Alzheimer's Abeta42 polypeptide in Drosophila}},
journal = {PloS one},
year = {2008},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0003966},
pmid = {19088848},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003966}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Alzheimer's (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that afflicts a significant fraction of older individuals.
- We found that Tl loss-of-function mutations dominantly suppress the neuropathological effects of the Alphabeta42 polypeptide while gain-of-function mutations that increase receptor activity dominantly enhance them.
- Since postmortem studies have shown that the Ilk-1-->NFkB innate immunity pathway is substantially upregulated in the brains of AD patients, the demonstration that the Tl-->NFkB signaling actively promotes the process of Alphabeta42 induced cell death and tissue degeneration in flies points to possible therapeutic targets and strategies.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 40/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (PloS one) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2008 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Laboratory or animal study (title names “drosophila”) — scores zero |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 19088848) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 23 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100. |
| Total | 40 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Brain scans and imaging
Also tagged “abeta42”
3 studies in the library carry the topic tag “abeta42”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 3 tagged studies.